3
\$\begingroup\$

Our party has a level 4 gestalt Scout 4 // Ranger 1 / Swashbuckler 2 / Rogue 1

Heroforge came up with base saves of +5 +5 +0

By my calculation the scout side should offer +1 +4 +1

On the other side, level 1 Ranger: +2 +2 +0, Level 2 Swashbuckler +3 +0 +0, Level 1 Rogue +0 +2 +0 for a total on that side of +5 +4 +0

Using the Gestalt rule of using whichever side gives you the better result, I come up with a final set of saves of: +5 +4 +1

Did I do something wrong, or did Heroforge?

\$\endgroup\$
1

1 Answer 1

7
\$\begingroup\$

By default, the way you do this is with a level-by-level approach:

Scout 1 (+0/+2/+0) // Ranger 1 (+2/+2/+0) = +2/+2/+0

Scout 2 (+0/+1/+0) // Swashbuckler 1 (+2/+0/+0) = +2/+1/+0 (total: +4/+3/+0)

Scout 3 (+1/+0/+1) // Swashbuckler 2 (+1/+0/=0) = +1/+0/+1 (total: +5/+3/+1)

Scout 4 (+0/+1/+0) // Rogue 1 (+0/+2/+0) = +0/+2/+0 (total: +5/+5/+1)

So neither you nor Heroforge is right.

That said, these rules are dumb. They work out reasonably well for this particular build at this particular level, but there are a lot of combinations where these rules result in extremely poor bonuses for no good reason. The characters that result are inconsistent with the expectations of the system.

A better method, in general but especially with gestalt, is to incorporate Unearthed Arcana’s “fractional BAB/saves” scheme. In this, you round down after adding up your classes, rather than before. It results in a much cleaner, consistent BAB and saving throw progression.

If you use that, the progression becomes this:

Scout 1 (+⅓/+2½/+⅓) // Ranger 1 (+2½/+2½/+⅓) = +2½/+2½/+⅓

Scout 2 (+⅓/+½/+⅓) // Swashbuckler 1 (+2½/+⅓/+⅓) = +2½/+½/+⅓ (total: +5/+3/+⅔)

Scout 3 (+⅓/+½/+⅓) // Swashbuckler 2 (+½/+⅓/+⅓) = +½/+½/+⅓ (total: +5½/+3½/+1)

Scout 4 (+⅓/+½/+⅓) // Rogue 1 (+⅓/+2½/+⅓) = +⅓/+2½/+⅓ (total: +5⅚/+6/+1⅓)

And then round down for a final saving throw progression of +5/+6/+1. Minor improvement to Reflex, which makes sense because you are taking three different classes with good Reflex saves.

I also strongly recommend eliminating the repeated +2 for each time you take a new class that has a given good save (this is not a part of the Unearthed Arcana variant, however). In this case, you would miss out on the +2 from Swashbuckler 1 and Rogue 1, and have a final, rounded-down saving throw base of +3/+4/+1 – very similar to a typical, single-classed character. This way multiclassing doesn’t have weird positive or negative effects on your saving throws, aside from the natural consequences of having good or bad saving throws.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ I agree that getting the +2's for each new class is weird. Thanks to the correction to the original RAW computation. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 29, 2014 at 15:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .