3
\$\begingroup\$

I'm stating an NPC as a Ranger via the DMG design steps (pages 187-188). It says they gain the Fighting Style class feature and I've chosen Two-Blade Fighting (page 104 of the PHB), which says they gain Toughness as a bonus feat.

Since NPCs don't have feats to begin with, does it mean they can't gain one as a bonus I.E. via Two-Blade Fighting or is this an exception to the rule?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Is there a reason you're doing this and not just reskining a monster that already exists, is the right level and has similar powers to what you want? \$\endgroup\$ – wax eagle Sep 21 '14 at 11:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ The group I DM is only 3 PCs strong with a big battle coming up. I thought a created NPC might work better than a reskinned monster for fighting alongside the PCs. Although if people think a reskin would be better I might give that a go instead. \$\endgroup\$ – Purple Monkey Sep 21 '14 at 12:05
5
\$\begingroup\$

Since you're building this NPC to support your party of three, build it as a Companion instead.

The main reason monsters are different in D&D 4e is to provide them with just the powers that would be useful in a single encounter, without worrying too much about daily resources or situational powers.
Just to make a comparison with monsters built as PCs, which was the shtick of 3.5e, an NPC could have its own special attacks, items just like a PC, class features, spells of any (spell)level up to whatever was appropriate for their (character)level. This produced weighty statblocks with many abilities that the NPC would have never used during the limited time he was on the scene.

You're not building for a one-shot monster. You're building for an NPC that will be kept in the spotlight that the game points on the PCs.
So, the first instinct would be to have it built as a PC, same level as your party, feats included.

Of course this introduces some new problems. First of all, he shouldn't steal the spotlight. Since he's the striker, it looks like your party lacks one. Focus on how the other players enable him to be their offense: it's basically an escort mission.
Second, PCs are complex machines with lots of fiddly bits. Unless your players want to communally decide what this character do, follow my initial suggestion and use the Striker Companion from DMG2.


This of course tells you that your problem is not how to assign feats to an NPC but how to build that NPC and I showed you a way to do so that's both better and avoids the feat problem.
Anyway, you might be willing to create NPCs as monsters and fall into the problem you asked about anyways. While I'd just consider giving him the benefits of the feat even if he does not get feats, my experience tells me you shouldn't - build a monster or reskin an existing one instead, because the monsters with class levels proved unsatisfactory to me and to whoever I talked with.

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Use a reskinned monster instead.

These are already balanced and you don't have to worry about construction rules. Find one of the appropriate level with the properly themed powers and just hand it to your PCs to play with.

This saves you tons of headaches with NPC creation rules (which are likely out of balance pretty dramatically at this point), and keeps things simple.

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

As the rules state it, yes, this would be an exception

However, if you want to make this ranger a little stronger, you may want to give it feats.

Also as others have said, a simpler (and possibly more effective) solution could be to re-skin a monster. It would already be balanced and you don't have to put the effort into building it.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.