9
\$\begingroup\$

I'm playing a rogue 3/ sorcerer 1 as a prelude to an arcane trickster. Since I expect to be spending more time in melee than most spellcasters, I want to have pretty good AC, but the armor I have now (studded leather) has a 15% arcane spell failure chance. I checked out this question, but most of it only applies to 3.5, and I'm playing pathfinder.

How should I deal with arcane spell failure from armor in Pathfinder?

\$\endgroup\$
9
\$\begingroup\$

Become Proficient in your Armor

It'll cost you two feats, but since you're a Rogue, it should only cost you the one.

Light Armor Proficiency

Arcane Armor Training

Every turn, spend your Swift Action to reduce the spell failure by 10%. This would be great if it didn't require you be CL 3, which you will eventually be, but not realistically soon.

Mithral Armor

Mithral Armor reduces spell failure by 10%, but it doesn't transfer to newer suits when you want to upgrade. Be prepared to wear the same mithral shirt every day for the rest of your campaign.

Don't Cast Somatic Spells

One thing very few people think of is just avoiding spells that require movement. If you work strictly with verbal spells, there's nothing you need to worry about.

Stop Needing to Move

Still Spell, costs a feat and a spell-level, but makes all of your spells Verbal only. As a Sorc 1, you're never going to be able to benefit from the feat itself, though. Alternatively, you can get a Lesser Rod of Still Spell for your Level 1 spells. Keep it at your waist or in a wrist sheathe for easy access and out the window go your chances of failure.

\$\endgroup\$
6
\$\begingroup\$

Mage Armor

The other option than the one Axoren suggested is to not worry about wearing armor at all. The first level Sorcerer / Wizard Spell Mage Armor provides a +4 Bonus to Armor class that even works against Incorporeal creatures, Making it better than any light armor that you could get at that level without providing any of the drawbacks such as armor check penalty (Which rogues don't like because it affects a lot of their skills) or Arcane spell failure.

A Wand of mage armor would cost 750gp for a first level caster and a first level spell, which lasts for 50 encounters, or one hour per casting. Later on you can get higher level castings of the spell to make it harder to dispel if you're the target of such an effect.

As early on in the game as you are I would not worry about armor until you start hitting the levels which you get moderately enchanted items, since you'll have to take the Arcane Armor Training feat to remove the failure chance. Once you start getting armor with useful enchants and high level enchantment bonuses you can move on from mage armor while establishing a base of power with other useful items. (Such as a Ring of Blinking)

The only downside to the Mage Armor method is if facing arcane spell casters above fifth level they have access to the spell dispel magic, however there are better uses of their action economy than dispelling a 1st level spell off a rogue, provided you're remaining stealthy and undetected they shouldn't have the opportunity to do so. If you want to prevent dispel attempts you can get a heightened wand of mage armor later on to compensate for the higher caster level.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Just an FYI, the need to use UMD for the wand is obsolete because you have access to the Sorcerer spell list. This is a good alternative to actual armor and should be considered unless you require a specific armor material or armor modification for your Rogue. Just be aware that it can be Dispelled when facing enemy spell casters, something that should be added to this answer. \$\endgroup\$ – Axoren Oct 12 '14 at 5:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ -1: Spending the cash on a consumable wand is very bad advice. It wouldn't be worth it anyway (there are better ways to get armor without drawbacks from items), but is especially egregious to suggest to a character who's already got the ability to cast such spells directly via sorcerer levels. Would be a +1 without the wands bit. \$\endgroup\$ – Matthew Najmon Oct 12 '14 at 21:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ 750gp to not suffer the penalties of Arcane Spell Failure is cheap. Saving a feat is more important than gold in the long run. Not to mention he's a sorcerer so he could just make the wand himself for less. I don't agree with your reasoning. \$\endgroup\$ – Sandwich Oct 13 '14 at 5:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ "Not to mention he's a sorcerer so he could just make the wand himself for less." That would be at the cost of a different feat, Craft Wand. \$\endgroup\$ – Axoren Oct 14 '14 at 2:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ You can make a lot of different wands with Craft Wand though, And without Swift actions from having to use Arcane Armor training you can't use Quickened spells. \$\endgroup\$ – Sandwich Oct 14 '14 at 2:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.