Must it only be a plain and natural creatures? What of cave rats and giant spiders, for example?
1 Answer
Spirit Tongue
The grunts, barks, chirps, and calls of the creatures of the wild are as language to you. You can understand any animal native to your land or akin to one whose essence you have studied.
Are cave spiders and giant rats animals native to the druid's land?
Has the druid studied their essence or the essence of a very similar creature?
If the answer to either of the above questions is 'yes' then the triggering conditions for the move are met and the Druid can understand them. Note that understanding is not necessarily the same as being able to speak to.
To answer the question-within-the-question about whether such creatures are animals or not. This is Dungeon World, a high fantasy land of orcs, goblins and dragons. Why would a cave spider or giant rat not be considered a "plain and natural creature" in such a world?
If you're really stuck, why not just ask the Druid whether they're natural animals and use his/her answer (GM Principle: Ask questions and use the answers).
-
\$\begingroup\$ NB, Spirit Tongue only lets the Druid understand animals, not speak back in their "language". \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 17, 2015 at 16:21
-
\$\begingroup\$ @SevenSidedDie D'oh! You're quite right, I'll edit my answer. \$\endgroup\$– AikenCommented Feb 18, 2015 at 7:50
-
\$\begingroup\$ @SevenSidedDie Now that I think on it a bit further I don't see the Druid playbook explicitly denying the Druid the ability to speak back to them, so whether or not they can is probably down to the fiction of the particular Dungeon World they find themselves in. \$\endgroup\$– AikenCommented Feb 20, 2015 at 10:29
-
\$\begingroup\$ The move itself doesn't give them the ability to, but other fiction might, yes. That exactly how it ended up working in our campaign. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 20, 2015 at 15:10