3
\$\begingroup\$

According to this question, Invisible, but unhidden enemies are sensed automatically. However, this seems to contradict the Ranger's Feral Senses ability.

FERAL SENSES: You are also aware of the location of any invisible creature within 30 feet of you, provided that the creature isn’t hidden from you and you aren’t blinded or deafened.

This suggests that being able to sense unhidden invisible enemies is something special that only rangers can do. Is there a consistent ruling under RAW?

| improve this question | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ True, but the answers to that one falls under Interpretation #2, which I rebutted. \$\endgroup\$ – Strill Apr 3 '15 at 8:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ Is there any way to re-open that question somehow, since I don't find any of the answers satisfactory? \$\endgroup\$ – Strill Apr 3 '15 at 8:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ What would I do in order to include the new information in that old question, and point out that the old answer is no longer satisfactory, in spite of its many upvotes? An onlooker will just see what appears to be a satisfactory answer, and move on. \$\endgroup\$ – Strill Apr 3 '15 at 8:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Strill Assuming you mean that you want to see new answers on the question I linked, that's what bounties are for. \$\endgroup\$ – Miniman Apr 3 '15 at 8:36
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I had this very question a while back: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/49639 (please pardon the lousy title, it was my first post) wax eagle gave a pretty thorough answer that left me unhappy but convinced. \$\endgroup\$ – GoblinTheodicy Apr 3 '15 at 11:40

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.