6
\$\begingroup\$

The book Oriental Adventures for D&D 3.0 was updated in Dragon magazine #318, but it didn't include an update for the shaman's animal companion from 3.0 to 3.5.

I have heard that the druid had the same system of obtaining and using its animal companion as shamans did in 3.0 books. I don't have access to 3.0 books so I don't know if that's true.

Can anyone help with this? How would the 3.0 Oriental Adventures shaman's animal companion be updated to 3.5? Is it just the same as a druid's?

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

The Animal Companion wasn't 'updated' in Dragon Magazine.

In 3.0 the Shaman and the Druid had the exact same type of animal companion. With 3.5, the spell Animal Friendship was removed and the Animal Companion that druids enjoy now are what they became. The Shaman didn't receive that update. Your DM would have to make a ruling.

  1. Make it the same as a Druid's Animal Companion.

    This makes the most sense functionally since Oriental Adventures 3.0 became Legend of the Five Rings rather than Oriental Adventures 3.5. This option would correctly capture the possible intent of the original Animal Companion. This option is superior to any other houserule the DM may come up with, simply due to the mechanics of the time matching the classes of the time. Times and mechanics were updated for one (the druid), but not the other (the shaman) because WoTC didn't update Oriental Adventures at all, a third party did in the form of Legend of the Five Rings. To call it like you see it, make the Animal Companion 3.0 be an Animal Companion 3.5.

If the DM doesn't want to make it the same as the Druid's Animal Companion, like the DM should, the DM can houserule some other possibilities, such as:

  1. Make it the same as a Ranger's Animal Companion.

    This makes the second most sense. If a DM thinks allowing only a Druid should have the most powerful Animal Companion, then the Ranger is the runner-up. Ranger's Animal Companions being the same as a Druid's, only weaker, still gives a decent Animal Companion.

  2. Make it the same as a Wizard's Familiar.

    This suggestion comes into play strictly by the original wording of "...can't have more than two hit dice." Once again, if a DM only wants a Druid to have the most powerful Animal Companion, and if he wants to keep the hit dice limitation, then allowing it to function as a familiar would at least give it some survivability and some other perks such as allowing it to deliver spells.

  3. Give you Wild Cohort as a bonus feat.

    This option gives the player an Animal Companion, but is slightly weaker than the Druid's and the Ranger's, therefore being a little more unique. This option would only be good if your DM wants the Druid's and the Ranger's Animal Companion unique to them - without costing you a feat.

  4. Keep it the way it is (ensuring your animal companion will be a housepet around level 6.)

    This option is if the DM wants to keep it literal to the text, however is extremely limiting because of the spell is no longer "a thing.") If he allowed it to be cast anyway, your Animal Companions, although numerous, would be extremely weak, and would serve merely as mooks to stand in your enemies way - which may or may not be too bad of a thing.

  5. Give some sort of bonus to Handle Animal.

    Giving, say, a bonus to Handle Animal and allow you gather animals in that fashion would be the least favorable, but if he is an absolute adamant about not giving the other options, giving a bonus in power similar to a Rogue's Trap Sense, would still be something; which would be better than nothing.

What would I do as DM?

I would allow the player to have the same Animal Companion as a Druid. It would not be game breaking. The Shaman is not a Druid, after all.


Information from Books

Rokugan Campaign Setting, Page 76

This book did not have a shaman as a core class. It had a shaman as a prestige class, and is for Ratlings. Hence, the name of the prestige class was Ratling Shaman.

Oriental Adventures, Page 24

Animal Companion: A 1st-level shaman may begin play with an animal companion. This animal is one that the shaman has befriended with the spell animal friendship. It can have up to 2 Hit Dice. (While the shaman is 1st level, this particular animal is loyal enough to stay with him, even though an adventuring shaman usually can only maintain animal friends whose Hit Dice total up to his level.) Alternatively, the shaman may have more than one animal companion provided the animals’ total Hit Dice don’t exceed 2. The shaman can also cast animal friendship in play (see the spell description in the Player’s Handbook).

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

In 3.0, both druid and shaman used the same system for obtaining an animal companion, based on the animal friendship spell.

In 3.5, the druid’s system for obtaining an animal companion was overhauled, and animal friendship ceased to be a spell. And while the shaman’s animal companion goes unmentioned in the Oriental Adventures 3.5 update, its spellcasting is addressed:

The 3.5 revision introduced many changes to spells. Refer to the 3.5 Accessory Update (available at www.wizards.com) for general information about changes to spell names, levels, and schools. Player’s Handbook should change the same way for Oriental Adventures spellcasters. For example, animate dead used to be a 5th-level wizard spell (and a 5th-level maho-tsukai spell); now it is 4th level for both wizards and maho-tsukai.

Thus, the animal friendship spell is no longer a shaman spell, since it is no longer a spell at all. The shaman animal companion feature therefore no longer functions as written.

In a 3.5 game, I strongly feel the only sensible interpretation of these facts is that the Dragon magazine article assumed that it was understood that the shaman’s animal companion class feature would be updated as was the druid class feature of the same name. As always in any printed medium, space in Dragon magazine was at a dire premium, and they probably saved quite a lot of it by not specifying each class feature that mirrors a core class’s feature is updated the same as that core class. But this comes at the cost of some confusion for us, particularly since the shaman’s animal companion class feature doesn’t actually reference the druid at any point, and it’s not immediately obvious to someone unfamiliar with the 3.0 druid that it is the same thing.

Bottom line: in a 3.0 game, the shaman’s animal companion feature works like the druid’s. The same should also be true in a 3.5 game, so the shaman should use the 3.5 druid’s animal companion rules.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ "I strongly feel" That is your opinon. Do not bash on the other mans answer if you are just going to state your opinion here. You repeat alot of what he is saying in his answer. I do appreciate the spell change, already knew that but someone running into the same problem might not have. Since there is no offical changes made, all of what both of you are saying is homebrew, so please do not complain on that. Lastly since you seem to be wanting to improve on his answer you can help by adding fact in what he is saying. AKA what system/spell did: Rangers and Wizards use for their 3.0 system? \$\endgroup\$ – Simon May 25 '15 at 21:42
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Simon I bash no one; you should avoid reading in things that aren’t there for your own benefit, but for mine, I am going to insist that you definitely do not put words in my mouth, even if you continue to choose to read them into what I have said. My strong feeling is about updating the 3.0 animal companion rules to 3.5 for the shaman vs. leaving them as the 3.0 rules; nothing to do with any other answer or the options another answer might offer. My opinion and answer is that to do anything other than updating the shaman in line with the druid is, quite simply, the wrong thing to do. \$\endgroup\$ – KRyan May 25 '15 at 21:59
1
\$\begingroup\$

First off, I'd like to clarify that I could not find an official source on this matter, as it simply has not been covered in the Dragon Magazine.

The forums and wikia I've stumbled upon have all dealt with the matter the way you assumed you should. Since the Animal Companion has not been covered in any official 3.5 source, but has always been rather similar to the druid's Animal Companion, they have become identical.

However, I advice that if you plan on playing a shaman in 3.5, you should discuss this with your DM first, because there is no official source. He'll probably agree, but better safe than sorry.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.