I'm currently a player/co-dm for a 5e campaign. There is one player who is trying to power game and do his best to gain the upperhand in all situations. This has led to him abusing wording on certain abilities or feats to get more than the DM deems reasonable. Most recently the group has hit level 4 and feats were chosen. He has switched his feats 3 or 4 times now trying to decide on the "best" one. He finally settled on Alert and then the arguments started particularly about this line.

You can’t be surprised while you are conscious.

The DM wanted an NPC to pickpocket us. The NPC was successful and made off with some of our gold. The player immediately began to argue that he can't be pick pocketed because he can't be surprised and he always knows what is going on around him. The DM disagreed and said that applied to combat scenarios. It is also important to point out that the player's character was completely distracted while it happened.

So can a character with Alert be pick pocketed? Is a character with Alert always vigilant to their person and surroundings so nothing can happen to them without their notice? Even when completely and totally distracted/not paying attention?

  • 34
    \$\begingroup\$ DM: "A Red Dragon shows up". Player: There hasn't been a dragon in these parts in over a thousand years, I'd be very surprised if there were one now. Looks at DM, expecting Dragon to vanish to avoid a contradiction \$\endgroup\$
    – Scott
    Commented Jul 16, 2015 at 22:06
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Time to add a new status effect: Denial. A character in denial of a enemy can't see or hear it (-20 on checks) and is unaware of all actions taken by the target, including attacks against allies or movement of items etc. When taking damage from the target a character has a 50/50 chance to leave denial state. A player can always enter of leave the denial as a free action. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dorus
    Commented Jul 17, 2015 at 9:20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ New Alert Feature: Know all the secrets of the universe, and go completely mad. \$\endgroup\$
    – Zibbobz
    Commented Jul 17, 2015 at 14:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's never the role of the player to make those sort of judgements anyway. The DM can say "you're a super alert guy and notice the pickpocket" but the player can't make that choice. Imagine getting pickpocketed then yelling "Hey you can't pickpocket me! I would have noticed!!" On the other hand, having your characters just get pickpocketed could be a poor move by the DM, as the characters have no control over what's happening to them. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 17, 2015 at 16:41

1 Answer 1


There is nothing in Alert that prevents you from being pickpocketed.

Surprised is a very specific state which refers to the beginning of a combat. Surprise is a state where a creature is unaware of another creature when combat begins, in this case the surprised creature a) cannot take an action on its first turn and b) cannot take reactions until after its first turn.

It has nothing to do with out of combat situations such as being pickpockted.

  • 16
    \$\begingroup\$ Yes. The Alert feat conspicuously lacks any text resembling "you automatically detect all attempts at stealth and sleight of hand." \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 16, 2015 at 21:15
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I would expect that should he have noticed that he was being pickpocketed, he wouldn't have been (in the state of) surprised. Should he have won the initiative he could have attacked the pickpocket immediately. Normally the pickpocket would have had one round head start. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 17, 2015 at 8:07
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Or introduce your friend to the unexpected handing paradox. If the ability really worked literally as he claims, it would result in an error in logic in the universe (which clearly can only be resolved by the universe causing him to unlearn that feat). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 17, 2015 at 19:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .