There are differences among printings of the Player's Handbook which are not captured in the errata, as came up when recently discussing Druidic Foci and Arcane Wards.

How do I know which printing I have? How many printings which incorporate changes have there been? As some of the differences aren't identified as errata, is there a sense as to whether one printing or another is controlling?

I'm envisioning a situation at a table where two players are looking at the same page, seeing different text, and there's no mention of it in the errata. How to even know which is more-recent?


2 Answers 2


Somewhat oddly, your question is answered by the Sage Advice Compendium document which was first released as part of a Sage Advice article by Jeremy Crawford on the official D&D website entitled Rules Roundup.

This document says the following on the first page, under the "Errata" heading:

A corrected version of the book includes the following text toward the bottom of its credits page:

This printing includes corrections to the first printing.

At the time of writing this answer, there have only been two printings of the Player's Handbook: the original, and the latest which incorporates the errata updates. Any rules clarifications which are not considered errata are going to continue to be found in the updated versions of the Sage Advice Compendium document. The latest version is always accessible from the official D&D website, and includes a version number both in the file name and in the footer of the document. The latest version always takes precedence over previous versions. Note that the errata document can also be distinguished from later updates by its version number, which is also contained in the file name as well as the footer of the document.

  • 11
    \$\begingroup\$ + \infty for being able to find anything on dnd.wizards.com \$\endgroup\$
    – nitsua60
    Commented Aug 4, 2015 at 12:41
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Note that the DMG and MM (per dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/errata-may-2016), actually have two different variations on the “This printing includes corrections” text; one for the 6th printing of each, which include (as of the date of this comment) all errata, and another for the intermediate printings, which include all but the most recent errata. However, this answer is still accurate for the PHB, as it did not receive additional errata in May 2016. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 25, 2016 at 17:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ Note: The SAC no longer includes the quoted wording. However, I think that each errata PDF does list the printing of the book that the changes made as of that errata first appear in (e.g. the 2020 PHB errata says "All the updates here appear in the twelfth printing of the book.", and the XGtE errata says "The changes appear in recent printings of the book, starting with the fourth printing."). \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Commented Aug 31, 2020 at 23:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ ...But it seems the author of this answer hasn't visited RPG.SE in just over a year. \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Commented Aug 31, 2020 at 23:40

Look at the Copyright page. Near the bottom, under where it says "First Printing: August 2014" is a string of numbers, like "11 10 9 8 7". The last number in the string (or the first, if it counts up instead of down) is the printing number. My copy reads "9 8 7", so I must have the seventh printing.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Now that I know what these numbers serve, I'm wondering why the hell WotC used such a system instead of "Xth printing (includes corrections to the first edition)". \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 9, 2021 at 11:40
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This is standard in the publishing industry. What's odd is that I think WOTC has done things similar to what you suggest in the past. \$\endgroup\$
    – Calion
    Commented Jun 10, 2021 at 17:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .