The wizard in my game has requested the ability to change out his cantrips similarly to his higher level spells. His justification is that every other wizard spell is memorizable, so having fixed spells seems antithetical. I kind of agree with him.

I know that there is no mechanism for changing cantrips, but I'm trying to come up with a fair means of doing so.

The two extremes, as I see it, are:

  1. Cantrips can be swapped out just like preparing any other spell.
  2. Retrain a the cantrip, taking 250 days of Downtime, as if learning a new skill.

I'm interested in having a good middle ground option, patterned on other rules, if possible.

Here's the house rules I have tentatively decided on. Critiques welcomed.

Cantrip House Rules

For all following rules, when using a cantrip that you don't currently "know", for classes that use a spell book, the cantrip must be in the spell book. Cantrips count as 1st level spells for purposes of price and scribing.

  • When you gain a level, you may swap one cantrip for another that you have available.

  • As a Downtime Activity, a cantrip can be swapped for another that you have available after 10 days of practice and the expenditure of 20gp.

  • Cantrips can be prepared and cast as 1st level spells. If the cantrip effects improve with level, the spell slot used to cast it must be 2 levels higher per step of improvement.

  • Cantrips can be cast as rituals. The cantrip improves with level as normal.

As with any house rule, I reserve the right to change it if it breaks.

Be warned! My DMing style is quite liberal. If you use this, wizards, druids, & clerics in your group may become unbalanced.

  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ Ignoring his justification for the moment, what is he trying to achieve with this? Does he regret some of the cantrips he's chosen and wants to fix his mistake, or does he just want to further increase the flexibility of the wizard? \$\endgroup\$ – Miniman Sep 18 '15 at 7:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think his main motivation is regret for one of his choices. I wouldn't mind him swapping that out as a rewrite. But also, he and I both see the cantrip concept as being oddly inflexible on a flexible class like wizard (and cleric & druid, as well). I'm trying to think of a way to put a little flexibility back into cantrips without giving carte blanche. \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Sep 18 '15 at 16:41
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ How about a shorter downtime that is still long enough to prevent preparing for some fight/challenge? Justify it by saying they can be switched, but are so innate to use that it requires more than the standard spell prep time to do so. Basically a middle option between the two extremes you list. Also, what ever time you set, you reserve the right to modify if it is being abused. \$\endgroup\$ – Lawtonfogle Sep 18 '15 at 17:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Lawtonfogle I like that! I'm eyeing the "Training for level" rules for times. \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Sep 18 '15 at 18:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ All the rules sound good :) Check my edited answer for a comment on the "one cantrip per level" rule, though, as well as an extra idea. \$\endgroup\$ – DaFluid Sep 19 '15 at 11:22

The idea with cantrips is that those are spells that the wizard is most familiar with. He used/practiced them so many times that he can use them at will, effortlessly. It doesn't make much sense that he could forget one of those and perfect another in a short span of time. For a permanent effect, I would agree that he could change it during Downtime.

If your player really regrets one of his choices, though, and you're not planning to give them downtime any time soon, you can think of a special one-time mechanic just to accommodate this change. For example, he could get possessed by a ghost of an ancient wizard during an encounter and his mind could get permanently altered as a side effect. You can always add other fun side effects as a "price" for such catering to the player's wishes, like Tourette's, strange visions or making his magic more unstable (always hurting him on a critical miss).

If your player just want the ability to occasionally use one of the cantrips he does not have, let him. Just make him use a spell slot for it. Any cantrip can be reasonably used as a first level spell in its weakest form. If he wants to use a stronger version of the cantrip, make him use more slots. You can look into how much damage it would do compared to regular spells to decide on the appropriate number of slots. If it's not a damage cantrip, one slot per improvement should do it.

Personal example of cantrip roleplay:

When I made my cleric, I thought carefully which cantrips would make sense for my background, so I chose Mending as one of my cantrips instead of something that would usually prove more useful (like Light). I've also avoided taking Guidance at first level, as I plan to build up to it through our campaign by continually assisting and advising my fellow adventurers. If a change of a cantrip would ever be more than a change in mechanics of the PC and actually make sense and contribute to the roleplay, then I would petition for it strongly. Otherwise, I'd say it's dabbling dangerously in the realm of min-maxing.

While I agree that being able to change one cantrip per level is mechanically sound, I'm still unsure if it fits from a roleplaying perspective. Maybe one every two or three levels. But I am leading only a low level group, where the time between levels is relatively short. If your players are around level 10, it might be enough time to retrain a cantrip. Especially if they're traveling in between distant locations, with not much happening on the road. The player should definitely roleplay the activity, though, making sure to note he's training the cantrip of his choosing.

On that note, some sort of training regime could be an additional mechanic. You could specify the number of training points required to change a cantrip. The player could then roll the die of your choice every time he trains (at maximum once per long rest) to accumulate training points. Or, he could spend a spell slot to do it, enabling him to spend all of his unused spell slots before his long rest. That would speed up the training the more unused slots he has, but leave him open to the risk of being "too tired to cast proper spells" in case of a surprise ambush during the long rest.

The "using unspent spell slots" scenario fits roleplaying well, too. For instance, if a player would want to learn Ray of Frost (1d8 damage), he could say that instead of casting one 1d8-damage ray he's casting 1d8 one-damage rays. After a sufficient number of rays cast, you'll say that the player has perfected the spell and can use it at will from now on. This would, of course, only be possible with cantrips, as the other spells are "too complicated" or "require too much energy" to be cast without spending a slot.

| improve this answer | |
  • \$\begingroup\$ Good ideas here! Thanks! > If your player just want the ability to occasionally use one of the cantrips he does not have, let him. Just make him use a spell slot for it. If he wants to use a stronger version of the cantrip, make him use more slots. This is a great idea! I'll probably include this as an option even if I come up with a swapping rule. > Otherwise, I'd say it's dabbling dangerously in the realm of min-maxing. I agree in general, but min-maxing isn't much of a problem in this campaign. In fact, one player seems intent on max-minning!!! \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Sep 18 '15 at 16:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ +1 for the innovative ideas present here as well as the focus on RAW cantrips being rote spells the caster has used all of their life. \$\endgroup\$ – Lino Frank Ciaralli Sep 18 '15 at 18:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ @WillRhodes "In fact, one player seems intent on max-minning!!!" I love those :D Inspiration point magnets! \$\endgroup\$ – DaFluid Sep 19 '15 at 10:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DaFluid I wholeheartedly agree that anyone using my suggested house rule should tighten it up (limit the frequency of changing to every other or every third level) and tie it more to roleplaying. My game is rather looser than most, so I'm comfortable with the possibility of exploits. \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Sep 19 '15 at 20:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DaFluid By the way, the cantrip the wizzard regrets taking is Mending! He looted an Iron Cobra and tried to keep it in repair. Now the toy is broken beyond repair and he is sad that he made a poor choice.) \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Sep 19 '15 at 20:37

Allowing a wizard to have all the wizard cantrips at his disposal and being able to swap them around on a long rest like his other spells will give him a huge advantage. Many of the wizard cantrips offer different damage types, being able to swap to one that targets a creatures vulnerability whenever he comes across something different is huge.

Wizards are already flexible as it is and cantrips for all classes are quite powerful in their own right which makes picking the ones you feel are important to your character right.

If he feels he has made a mistake with one and would rather have another, I believe the fairest option would be allowing him the ability to swap 1 single cantrip for another when he levels, much like other classes can swap out one spell for another when they level up.

| improve this answer | |
  • \$\begingroup\$ I understand the reason for the inflexibility of cantrips. I am aware of the ramifications of allowing swapping them. I choose to accept those ramifications. I am seeking ideas on how to allow it but limit it. \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Sep 18 '15 at 16:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ Oh, I guess I misunderstood the first extreme as being able to retrain a cantrip on level-up like casters with Known Spells do. \$\endgroup\$ – El Suscriptor Justiciero Sep 18 '15 at 17:26
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Tashio's concerns about play balance are quite valid. If the wizard gets this significant added versatility, what do all the other characters get? Do they get to swap out fighting styles, etc., this easily? \$\endgroup\$ – Tim Grant Jul 6 '16 at 3:47

When he levels up, let him choose to unlearn one cantrip in exchange for another. Similar to how the RAW allows Sorcerers and Bards to trade out non-cantrip spells when they level up.

| improve this answer | |
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is a fairly harsh option, but not unreasonable. It's probably the option I'll fall back on if I can't come up with an elegant house rule. \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Sep 18 '15 at 16:46

If you allow feats in the game, remind your player that they exist, and can be taken instead of one of their class's stat increase.

There are several feats in 5e that give small boosts to a character's casting ability. Note that only Spell Sniper requires you to be able to cast spells already before taking it.

  • Magic Initiate: 2 cantrips from a chosen spell list, as well as a 1st level spell that is usable 1/long rest.

  • Ritual caster: start a spellbook, and learn 2 spells with the "Ritual" tag from a chosen class. You can learn more Ritual spells later as you encounter them.

  • Spell Sniper: All your spells that make an attack roll have double range and ignore most cover, plus you learn an attack cantrip from a chosen spell list.

While none of these allow a player to swap out their character's known cantrips, they do allow some to be added, possibly replacing the need for it.

I'm adding this answer for completeness. It's a different method that might be preferred by DM's who have dislike houserules and homebrew. Additionally it allows greater flexibility in a way, because even if you are already a caster of some variety, you are not required to choose that spell list with these feats, giving access to one or two choice spells from a list you could not otherwise access.

Looking over the house-rules you adopted, they seem quite reasonable. An updated on how they have worked out in practice would be interesting.

| improve this answer | |
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for the answer. As for my house rule. it worked fine for the situation (player just swapped it out at level-up), but it hasn't seen any other play. If it does, I'll let you know. \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Jul 25 '16 at 17:53

This is an irritating one. As a player, I want to say yes, let him switch them out. As a DM, I want to say no, don't make it easy. Based on the description of a cantrip for a wizard, it is a magical skill rather than an actual spell. That said, I would really want to decide it on a case-by-case basis. Are we talking firebolt or prestidigitation? At any rate, rather than letting him change it, I have a very simple solution that is not exactly a houserule and rather elegantly circumvents the problem.

Step 1. Let him add cantrips to his spellbook, but not cast them. (Is this a houserule? I think a wizard could do it simply because a wizard cantrip is still a wizard spell.)

Step 2. Let him craft spell scrolls for those cantrips, using the optional (at least, I think they were optional) rules that are either in the PHB or DMG (I forget which.) If you are feeling really, really kind, let him craft wands for cantrips. (Super houserule-y option, but slightly more balanced than actually switching cantrips.)

| improve this answer | |
  • \$\begingroup\$ I like these ideas! Both scrolls and wands are entirely appropriate! And nowhere NEAR as houserule-y as you say. There are already cantrip wands in game, so they could be crafted as other magic items, and cantrip scrolls would hardly be gamebreaking! +1! \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Jul 7 '16 at 18:17

People tend to forget things they don't do/use often, like a language or the use of a particular tool/program.

If a player regrets taking aparticular cantrip, they probably don't use it much either. I would totally allow a player to swap a cantrip when leveling up if they haven't used it much in the last games since that'd make sense in the game.

I would also encourage the player to justify the new cantrip during the campaing prior to leveling up. For example, if the player wants to swap an unused cantrip for "shocking grasp", they should try to use more lighting-elemental spells than usual. Also, the DM could include more enemies that use the element, so the player has a way to train and learn the cantrip.

You could also force the characters to train the new cantrip during downtime. Be it with an NPC that knows the cantrip (and paying them accordingly) or by research (using a fraction of the resourses but taking longer time). I personally don't like to make the players train stuff they'll learn when leveling up, since the experience they earn during the game should be what teaches them the perks and skills they'll get at the new level.

| improve this answer | |

Elegant houserule;

  1. Wizards can change out cantrip selection on a 1:1 basis each time they level.
  2. By eschewing the use of two cantrips when preparing spells, a wizard may use 1 cantrip he does not know for that day only. A wizard may do this more than once while preparing spells.

Introduce a feat or other option to learn additional cantrips on a permanent basis if he wants to make that flexibility a permanent part of the character.

| improve this answer | |

Fair and Play-Balanced Retraining

Retraining is a big perk. If a wizard can re-train beyond what is allowed in the rules, all classes should be able to.

I have allowed retraining a class build option at leveling-up, similar to the rules in fourth edition:

When leveling up, a character may change one class build node option for a different choice. This can't involve eliminating anything physical in the game world.

Node Option?

By node option, I mean a decision you make when building your character that neither involves making additional choices, nor grants multiple powers as different levels.

Choosing a different Battle Master combat manuver is a node, but switching from Battle Master to Champion is not. Schools of magic, divine domains, sorcerous origins, etc., are also disallowed for retraining under this rule.


A cantrip known because of class can be changed, but not one known because of race

A skill learned because of their class can be changed, but not one known because of their background. (Although if a skill might have been learned from either the background or class, I'll give the benefit of the doubt)

Physical Manifestation Exception

If a class option involved creating something physical in the game world, such as a wizard adding a spell to their spellbook, that cannot be retrained. (This does not apply to cantrips, as they are always memorized.)

Limiting Minmaxing

These rules are pretty generous, and are easy to abuse by minmaxers. (I've used them for running games for new players and kids - I generally wouldn't be so generous with experienced gamers.) Damage cantrips, for example, are more useful at levels when they increase in damage (e.g., 5th level) than at other levels.

If you find some players leveraging this rule to really minmax instead of just figuring out your characters, you might want to limit it to one every two or three level-ups.

| improve this answer | |
  • \$\begingroup\$ These are pretty good rules. I tend to be a bit looser, but that's because I have no concerns about power gamers in my group, and because I'd rather allow a character to be completely rewritten than to be replaced with a different character that isn't involved in my storylines. \$\endgroup\$ – Will Rhodes Jul 25 '16 at 17:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ @WillRhodes, thanks. Looser is fine (a good consistent "loose retraining" system might be a subject of another question if it can pass the "specificity" test). This "node retraining" rule though, is meant to specifically define how to allow cantrip retraining without disadvantaging classes that don't have them. \$\endgroup\$ – Tim Grant Jul 25 '16 at 18:01

Try to find out why your player wants this versatility from cantrips. These spells are mainly as a last resort if he runs out of regular spell slots or to create minor magic effects without expending slots. If he is one of those creative magic use to the fullest types then simply give him the opportunity to learn more utility spells of the regular levels. Or maybe give him more one shot items. Of course only if it does not break your campaign. Spells carefully to be considered are e.g. Fly levitate teleport etc. These work well in one campaign and can cause major dm headache in another. That's the reason why I for instance always reserve the right to disallow specific player selected spells in the campaigns that do dm.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.