2
\$\begingroup\$

I am a bit confused about the wording of the two weapon fighting feats

Two weapon fighting section in chapter 8

First, if your off-hand weapon is light, the penalties are reduced by 2 each

The Improved 2 weapon fighting feat entry

Benefit: In addition to the standard single extra attack you get with an off-hand weapon, you get a second attack with it, albeit at a –5 penalty

The Greater 2 weapon fighting entry

Benefit: You get a third attack with your off-hand weapon, albeit at a –10 penalty

Does using a light weapon decrease the penalties for these extra attacks?

\$\endgroup\$
9
\$\begingroup\$

Not the way you're thinking

The penalty reduction for using a light off-hand weapon is applied once, giving your primary attack modifiers with each weapon. For example, if you have the Two-Weapon Fighting feat and are using a one-handed weapon in each hand, both your primary weapon and off-hand weapon make attacks at -4 from your normal attack bonus with just a single weapon. If you have a light weapon in your off hand, the penalty to each attack is reduced to -2.

Improved Two-Weapon Fighting and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting give additional attacks with your off-hand weapon at -5 and -10 penalties respectively, which are relative to the attack modifiers you use with your first main hand and off hand attacks. So, for example, if you're wielding a light weapon in your off hand, your first attack with your off-hand weapon is at -2 from your normal attack bonus, while your second attack with that weapon is at -7. The penalty reduction is already applied once at the start, it doesn't get applied additional times for the iterative attacks.

The penalties on Improved and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting are meant to simulate the normal reduction of attack modifier you get with iterative attacks you receive from having a high Base Attack Bonus, hence why the prerequisites require a high enough BAB that you can make the same number of iterative attacks with your main hand.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ ohhhhhh. Well, that helps a lot. I thought it was a flat for each. Thank you for that information \$\endgroup\$ – Cataru Moore Sep 23 '15 at 20:07
2
\$\begingroup\$

No, it doesn’t. Note, however, that the penalties are different.

In Chapter 8, they are talking about penalties that are applied to every attack in the full-attack where you use the Two-Weapon Fighting combat option. If you have the Two-Weapon Fighting feat and are using a light weapon in the offhand, when you use the Two-Weapon Fighting combat option to get an extra attack with your light weapon, all attacks in that full-attack take a −2 penalty.

For instance, if you had BAB +5, no other bonuses to attack, the Two-Weapon Fighting feat, and you chose to use the Two-Weapon Fighting combat option with a light weapon in the offhand, you would make two attacks, the first an attack with the main hand weapon at +3, and then a second attack with the offhand weapon, also at +3.

The penalties described in the Improved and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting feats apply only to the new attack those feats grant.

So if when the above character got BAB +6/+1 and took Improved Two-Weapon Fighting, the −2 penalty from using Two-Weapon Fighting at all remains. The same main hand attack, at +4 now, and offhand attack, also at +4, remain. There is also an iterative attack from high BAB, at −1, and then Improved Two-Weapon Fighting effectively gives an “iterative” to the offhand attack, so you get another attack at −1. So in total, +4, +4, −1, −1.

At BAB +11/+6/+1, with Greater Two-Weapon Fighting, the same kind of thing happens: you take a −2 penalty across the board, and Improved and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting each give a bonus attack that mirrors the +6 and +1 iteratives, respectively, so you get two attacks at +9, two at +4, and two at −1.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I would greatly appreciate any illumination on the source of problems in this answer that merit a downvote; to the best of my knowledge, everything contained herein is accurate and addresses the question. \$\endgroup\$ – KRyan Sep 23 '15 at 22:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.