16
\$\begingroup\$

Let's say that I'm about to run a combat-heavy 3rd level one-shot for a group of players. Balance and challenge rating is still very important, but one of my players says he'd like to play a humanoid monster like a Bugbear for the session.

If, hypothetically, I'm lax about the idea of my PCs playing a monster, does the fact that a Bugbear Chief is CR 3 mean that he would have a balanced play experience alongside a party of 3rd level PCs?

In other words, does CR correlate 1:1 with level if a monster is played as a PC? If I let a player play a CR 3 monster in the party in place of a 3rd level PC, can I budget the encounters roughly the same?

If not, what is the true ratio?

\$\endgroup\$
30
\$\begingroup\$

The short answer is that a regular bugbear (CR 1) is a closer add on to the party -- even so, he's a fighter who might outshine other martial characters at level 3, and is at least comparable.

The other answer is No, there isn't a ratio that is easy to use

Note: At low levels, the relationship gets tied to difficulty level of an encounter, and the ratio may appear to be three or four to one, but it's inexact. I'll illustrate why with your Bugbear example.

A monster’s challenge rating tells you how great a threat the monster is. For example, a party of four 3rd-level characters should find a monster with a challenge rating of 3 to be a worthy challenge, but not a deadly one. (Basic Rules, DM, p. 5)

Your CR 3 Bugbear chief is an encounter for a 3 or 4 person level 3 party, so he's closer to equivalent to 2 or 3 3d level characters. Adding a bugbear chief to your party adds a much stronger fighter who will outshine other martial characters. That's not such a great idea. A regular bugbear looks like a better fit than the chief.

Compare a Fighter, level 3, to a Bugbear (regular, CR 1).

(From page 120 of Basic Rules(2018)):
CR 1. Armor Class 16 (hide armor, shield) (Compares to fighter at lvl 3)
Hit Points 27 (5d8 + 5) (More than a level 3 Fighter)
Speed 30 ft. (Same as level 3 Fighter)
STR 15 (+2) DEX 14 (+2) CON 13 (+1) INT 8 (−1) WIS 11 (+0) CHA9 (−1)
(Not quite standard array, legal via point-buy)
Skills Stealth +6, Survival +2 (Comparable)
Senses darkvision 60 ft., passive Perception 10
(A bonus versus human, same as a dwarf or elf, comparable).
Languages Common, Goblin (No significant difference)

Here's where it gets tricky: each monster has different special abilities. This one's got two substantial advantages.

Brute. A melee weapon deals one extra die of its damage when the bugbear hits with it (included in the attack).

Surprise Attack. If the bugbear surprises a creature and hits it with an attack during the first round of combat, the target takes an extra 7 (2d6) damage from the attack1.

Major difference in damage dealt per round versus a level 3 Fighter who goes sword and board, and comparable (slightly more) than a fighter who uses two handed weapons. The sword and board fighter may have higher AC, and a comparable armor if going with the two-handed weapon / Chain mail set up. (Minor differences come out in the wash assuming a fighter with +5 (+3+2 prof) to hit and the bug bear with +4 to hit (+2 +2 prof))

The Rogue-like bonus when attacking with surprise. While a Fighter will have Action Surge, it doesn't trigger every round, though the Bugbear won't get surprise every round either. (A wash).

Morningstar. Melee Weapon Attack: +4 to hit, reach 5 ft., one target. Hit: 11 (2d8 + 2) piercing damage.

That's more than the 1H (notional 1d8+3) weapon for a sword and board fighter. Compare to a 2H sword (2d6 + 3) versus 2d8 +2 ... comparable.

Javelin. Melee or Ranged Weapon Attack: +4 to hit, reach 5 ft. or range 30/120 ft., one target. Hit: 9 (2d6 + 2) piercing damage in melee or 5 (1d6 + 2) piercing damage at range.

Same as your fighter at range, more effective in melee with the same weapon.

You state that ...

Balance and challenge rating is still very important,

Final answer: you need to do a detailed analysis (something like the above breakdown) of any monster you'd want to add to your party, and compare it to a PC, to see how close the power level is. CR is a soft guide at best.


1 If the party can set up a surprise attack/ambush, the Bugbear can do 2d8+2 + 2d6 in that round where a fighter would do 1d8+3 or 2d6+3 -- but most rounds of combat won't have that advantage.


WoTC has provided an "easy button" now on pages 118 through 120 of it's most recent official material, Volo's Guide to Monsters. The section entitled "Monstrous Adventurers" includes the same sort of starting racial mods for a bugbear as for dwarf, elf, halfling, etc, on page 119. It resembles the Goliath in terms of increased carrying capacity (one size category up), a boost in Strength and (in this case Dex), sneak attack damage like a rogue, and some other mods.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ I broadly agree, but I think this statement is incorrect: "Your CR 3 Bugbear chief is a rough equivalent to a 3 or 4 person level 3 party." The fact that it's a medium encounter, not a deadly one, suggests that a CR3 mob is not as strong as four level 3 characters, as there's little chance of it winning in a fair fight. \$\endgroup\$ – SirTechSpec Mar 24 '17 at 12:50
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @SirTechSpec Fair point, 2-3 might be a better estimate. \$\endgroup\$ – KorvinStarmast Mar 24 '17 at 12:55
12
\$\begingroup\$

Get Volo's Guide to Monsters. It details how to create several different monsters into PC's including Aasimar, Firbolgs, Goliaths, Kenku, Lizardfolk, Tabaxi, Tritons, Bugbears (page 120), Goblin, Hobgoblin, kobold, orc, and Yuan-ti pureblood. A great way to spice up your game!

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Yeah, this is probably the "right" answer but it needs more detail here in the answer to be useful. \$\endgroup\$ – mxyzplk says reinstate Monica Mar 24 '17 at 12:46
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @mxyzplk Whether or not the monster PC's in Volos are "balanced" is debatable, but it's closer to balanced than trying to use CR to reverse engineer a monster into a PC. \$\endgroup\$ – KorvinStarmast Mar 24 '17 at 13:03
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Exactly, which is why this is the right answer but just saying "it's in a book" makes for a low quality answer. Like I said. \$\endgroup\$ – mxyzplk says reinstate Monica Mar 24 '17 at 13:08
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ How does the book approach it? Has the poster used it and is it balanced in play? Et cetera. \$\endgroup\$ – mxyzplk says reinstate Monica Mar 24 '17 at 13:10
5
\$\begingroup\$

There is no simple correlation

The CR3 of the Bugbear Chief for example means it is an appropriate challenge for a party of 3rd level characters. In other words that one player alone would be only a tiny bit weaker than the rest of the party combined. Very far from balanced.

A simple Bugbear (CR1) would be more appropriate. Has as much HP as a Fighter with a Con of 14, bit less hit chance, bit higher damage.

The ratio is more or less 1:3, so go with a CR1 monster

For example, a party of four 3rd-level characters should find a monster with a challenge rating of 3 to be a worthy challenge, but not a deadly one. - MM p9

So 4 players are equivalent to a monster based on the Monster Manual. Once they become characters however, they are free to wear armor, offsetting the low AC that limited the CR in the first place. They can get better, even magical weapons.
Also, those 4 adventurers are expected to quite easily win against that monster. For this reason I think the relationship is more 1:3 than 1:4.
Of course things from the MM can lose power when they become players. Every attack from an Assassin (MM343) carries a very potent poison. However, PCs have to spend an action to apply a poison, and it is consumed after every attack.

So 1:3 is just a baseline, do a case by case decision.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.