Can "living constructs", such as the warforged from UA: Eberron, benefit from healing spells and the Medicine skill?

It's unclear whether they could be affected by healing magic, nor whether medical techniques could apply to a creature like a Warforged or Shardmind.

If they can, what would it look like?


5 Answers 5


In general, yes: a creature's type has no mechanical impact.

Cure spells work on creatures: constructs are creatures. However, all of the curative spells in the PHB (I think) specifically say they don't work on constructs or undead; this is not a general rule though.

Medicine works on "your companions": with a certain generosity of spirit, this extends to construct companions. Medicine allows you to stabilise or diagnose a disease. Since all constructs so far described are destroyed at 0hp, you can't stabilise those specific constructs. Nothing stops a construct contracting a disease, however, constructs are likely immune to organic disease; magical and construct only diseases are possible.

As to what it looks like: that's up to you.

So in general, yes, however, the specific cure spells and specific constructs so far published limit the general application.


Warforged and Shardminds are races very specific to the Eberron campaign setting.

There is no official 5e material as of this writing, but there is an Unearthed Arcana with a first draft of Warforged on the Wizards site. From that article:

Living Construct. Even though you were constructed, you are a living creature. You are immune to disease. You do not need to eat or breathe, but you can ingest food and drink if you wish.

It's not 100% clear if the line "living creature" means that you bypass the "construct" nature. That stated, the constructs in the MM have a large set of Immunities not given to the Warforged. So there's clearly a difference between them and "normal" constructs.

If you don't quite like the Unearthed Arcana version, there are several more "community" version here. Sadly, they use similar wording and offer no clarity.

As a DM, you're likely creating these races, so this decision is really up to you.

  • The easiest way to do this is to treat them like other humanoids and let everything work as normal. The Unearthed Arcana wording says they are immune to disease, but they can still be poisoned or charmed, etc. So they probably get disadvantage on a save vs. Shatter, but they otherwise interact with Necromancy in the same way as other races.
  • If you want to make them harder to heal, I would suggest being explicit and making it a racial trait rather than relying on their "construct" nature. Given them something like "anything normally requiring a Medicine check instead requires an Arcana check with the same DC" & "when receiving healing from a spell, they only receive healing if the caster also knows the Mending spell".
  • If you rely on their "construct" nature, you will have to go through a lot of decisions on how spells work. Does Raise Dead work? What about Animate Dead? What about Animate Object?

Treating a PC as full-on construct goes beyond just healing. So I would tread that lightly.


The mending cantrip specifically says it can repair constructs, but it doesn't give an HP value associated with that:

This spell can physically repair a magic item or construct, but the spell can’t restore magic to such an object.

The intro to the Monster Manual says, under "Type":

Constructs are made, not born. Some are programmed by their creators to follow a simple set of instructions, while others are imbued with sentience and capable of independent thought. Golems are the iconic constructs. Many creatures native to the outer plane of Mechanus, such as modrons, are constructs shaped from the raw material of the plane by the will of more powerful creatures.

The description of the warforged race in the Wayfinder's Guide to Eberron (p. 67) says, under the "Living Steel and Stone" heading (emphasis mine):

While they’re formed from stone and steel, warforged are living humanoids. Resting, healing magic, and the Medicine skill all provide the same benefits to warforged that they do to other humanoids.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already. Note that this question was asked in 2016, after the release of UA: Eberron, in which warforged first appeared with the "Living Construct" trait. \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Commented Jan 19, 2019 at 5:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ Since this issue has been clarified canonically (& contradicts prior answers), in the time since the accepted Answer was chosen, should this be reopened, or have the accepted answer switched to this one, since it's now the only fully correct one? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 25, 2021 at 7:51

No to cure, maybe to medicine

Cure Wounds states, "This spell has no effect on undead or constructs", so it's out.

Medicine lets you stabilize dying companions or diagnose an illness. The illness part isn't going to help as a warforged's Living Construct trait makes them immune to disease. They can be dying though so the RAW says you help them out. RAI I think this makes sense as if a construct is able to be, "dying", somehow perhaps the general medical techniques (keep the fluids from coming out) would still apply.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ But are 'living constructs' grouped in with 'constructs', or are they separate? Both undead and constructs are linked in that they are not alive but are merely animated, so that could be why Cure Wounds won't work on them. But living constructs are alive, so is that the deciding factor for whether cure spells work on them? \$\endgroup\$
    – Temp
    Commented Feb 5, 2016 at 22:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Zso Living construct is a trait on the warforged. Their type isn't listed by assuming it is construct isn't a stretch \$\endgroup\$
    – Ceribia
    Commented Feb 5, 2016 at 23:36
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ This was precisely the confusion I'm having in my current campaign. So far we have ruled that a 'Living Construct' has two types in it's tag. It is BOTH 'Living' and 'Construct' , making it unable to benefit from healing due to the wording of healing spells. I personally think this is NOT what was intended by WotC as EVERY player character race (Notice how they are all humanoids as well) are capable of receiving healing. There are NO redeeming qualities a Warforged have that make up for being unable to be healed by magical means; how could WotC possible have intended that? \$\endgroup\$
    – Airatome
    Commented Feb 6, 2016 at 0:04

You know, strictly speaking, neither the Celestial Warlock's "Healing Light" ability nor the Circle of Dreams Druid's "Balm of the Summer Court" ability explicitly exclude constructs or undead. Not sure if it's intended that way, but certainly useful if you've got Golems or Animated Dead in the party.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @User42253. Welcome to RPG.SE. Your answer will be improved by citing the source book (page references are handy) that support your response. You are also asked to answer the question as asked: this information will help, but is a partial answer at best. If you are attempting to comment on another answer, that privilege (commenting) takes a little more rep. Offering a good answer and asking questions are ways to increase your rep. Please take the tour and visit the help center to get a feel for how this site works. You have part of a good answer here: please edit it to improve it. :) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 7, 2018 at 15:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .