My fiance is running a campaign and the players have the opportunity to obtain a wyrmling black dragon. Now black dragons are chaotic evil, but the monk of the group believes that it shouldn't be killed outright just due to the fact that its race tends to be evil. He wants to attempt to teach and raise it in goodly or rather, less evil ways, but the other players want a backup plan to change its alignment if worst comes to worst. The problem is, the DM doesn't see anything involving forced alignment changes. Is there a mechanical way to handle this or is it going to be DM decision to add something to the game that isn't currently there?

  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Does the monk want to do this during 'down time' or as part of the ongoing adventure? See also the problem of dragons, even wyrmlings, being smarter than humans... on average. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 9, 2016 at 3:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ Related: How can I redeem the unjust? \$\endgroup\$
    – GMJoe
    Feb 9, 2016 at 4:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's going to be both during downtime and potentially as an ongoing adventure, possibly spanning generations of characters. \$\endgroup\$
    – Keith
    Feb 11, 2016 at 1:59
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ There is this tale of ancient and wise elven High Mages who thought themselves really smart, when they imprisoned some fiends and set the condition of their release to "When a Red Dragon that knows no Greed or Malice in his heart flies over the King's Throne" - what would you know, a few centuries later and their realm was no more. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 13, 2017 at 17:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ It might be worth reworking this question considering recent announcements about racial alignments: eg, dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/diversity-and-dnd, enworld.org/threads/… \$\endgroup\$
    – Kirt
    Aug 8, 2020 at 22:51

4 Answers 4


There are three ways to forcibly change something's alignment on the books. But none of them really work out well for you.

  1. Forced attunement. Arguably the least dangerous option, if you can somehow force the dragon to attune a magical item you might change its alignment. Perhaps a Geas? If your DM sees that working, and you have any of The Book of Vile Darkness, The Eye of Vecna, or The Hand of Vecna on you, the dragon's alignment will change. To Neutral Evil.

  2. To the Planes. Send your dragon on vacation to the Bytopia for 4 days ("Pervasive Goodwill" optional rule, DMB pp.59-60), The Abyss ("Vile Transformation" optional rule, DMG p.63) or the Nine Hells ("Pervasive Evil" optional rule, DMG p.64) and its alignment might change to Neutral Good, to Neutral Evil, or to Lawful Evil. (But dispel magic or remove curse will get rid of the Bytopian effect.)

  3. Enlist the Slaadi. Unfortunately (?) this won't work on your dragon--only on humanoids. But in the interests of completeness, here's the third way to forcibly change something's alignment: true polymorph the dragon into a humanoid form, then get a Blue Slaad to bring your (humanoid) target to 0 HP. It'll automatically become Chaotic Neutral. Of course that's a consequence of it becoming a Red Slaad.

In all seriousness, parenting's a hard job.

Raising something to "be good" in a world where alignment's a thing written into a stat block is absolutely a project you and your DM are going to have to tackle together. There're no easy outs here. (But there are good story opportunities here!)

But it just got a little bit easier....

Now, a half-year late, I've got to challenge the frame of your question. You say "now black dragons are chaotic evil." And you probably got that from the stat block, or from a generalization you're making based on all the black dragons you've encountered. But

The alignment specified in a monster's stat block is the default. Feel free to depart from it and change a monster's alignment to suit the needs of your campaign. If you want a good-aligned green dragon... there's nothing stopping you. (MM. p.7, "Alignment)

We all know that rule zero empowers the GM to change anything, but this is one of those situations where a published book says "hey, GM: you might need to tweak this dial." I know this question was all about getting "plan B" in order, but I think "plan A" has a little more going for it than one might have assumed.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you! I actually think this, along with some role-playing and shenanigans will be perfect. We hadn't remembered the section of the DMG about the planes forcing alignment shifts, but most certainly we can force any alignment in the end if it absolutely necessary. \$\endgroup\$
    – Keith
    Feb 9, 2016 at 3:35
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Don't forget the handy ol' Wish \$\endgroup\$
    – Angelica
    Jul 13, 2017 at 14:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ There was a whole section in one of the 3.X books about redemption of supposedly evil races, I believe it was the Book of Exalted Deeds that detailed an Illithid that was saved and nursed back to health by a pacifist monk and trained in martial arts, who then changed alignments voluntarily. Paradigm shifts and alignment changes are not easy and require a "world view shattering" event for the character involved in my world (also I believe the BOED also said something similar). But once doubt is instilled it is possible for redemption. Some are irredeemable... like a Pit Fiend though. :) \$\endgroup\$
    – Slagmoth
    Nov 4, 2019 at 14:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ @nitsua60 The OP has not been "seen" since '16. It might be worth adding to your answer given recent announcements about racial alignments: eg, dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/diversity-and-dnd, enworld.org/threads/… \$\endgroup\$
    – Kirt
    Aug 8, 2020 at 22:54

If you can trick or goad it to draw from a Deck of Many Things, it might draw the Balance card:

Balance: Your mind suffers a wrenching alteration, causing our alignment to change. Lawful becomes chaotic, good becomes evil and vice versa. If you are true neutral or unaligned, this card has no effect on you.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 For a creative answer, though the party may be opening a whole other can of worms trying to acquire a deck of many things AND drawing the balance card \$\endgroup\$ Jul 13, 2017 at 17:59
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @B.S.Morganstein I posted this one just for the sake of completness.... And they don't just need to draw the balance card. they need to make the dragon draw it. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 14, 2017 at 1:47

5E D&D is intended as a role playing game. You may be seeking RAW and 'Rules As Written' That said, if you want to play your game as RAF - Rules As Fun, you could make this into a brilliant role-play.

From experience: people gain many behaviours from biological circumstance. Be that from SAD (Seasonal Affective Disorder) that makes someone depressed, 'Roid Rage' when anabolic steroids cause people to act out in seeming rage or even any weird mood swings one can gain from any kind of malnutrition: the body has a strong input on feelings, thoughts and behaviour.

I recommend you role-play your Black Dragon as a creature with these odd 'chaotic and short sighted' behaviours. If one suggests a 'good' person is compliant with group needs, this dragon would be of a body that would not allow it to make full use of its extremely high wisdom and intelligence scores.

If you want a simple model for how this creature might behave: imagine an abusive relationship. This Black Dragon may genuinely love the parents! This would not stop them from being possessive, terse, jealous, greedy and cantankerous. This can make for some fantastic situations in-game. You can imagine that after years of terrible dragon-child rearing experiences the 'parents' eventually give up and leave the beast be. Perhaps the dragon suffers from some version of PTSD or even RAD ('Radical Attachment Disorder') - but the DM would still get to choose how this dragon would react.

A clever DM can make a loyal and loving motivation set without losing the chaotic and evil part. The best example may be Christine, the 1958 Plymouth Fury from a Stephen King book (by the name name). She was a terrible communicator and tended to slaughter anyone and everyone - but did her best to 'protect' her owner (though she failed).

  • \$\begingroup\$ Answers should generally stand on their own; rather than simply saying "the other answers cover RAW", you should ideally summarize their main point before moving on. In addition, since the sorting of answers may change with time and additional votes, you should avoid referring to an answer being "above" or "below" others (link directly to another answer if you want to reference a specific one). \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Nov 15, 2018 at 23:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you. Edited. That said, i am not sure if 'Rules As Fun' count in this curated website, even when i post my suggestions with ideas from psychology / DSM 5. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 15, 2018 at 23:27
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Well, OP asks "Is there a mechanical way to handle this or is it going to be DM decision to add something to the game that isn't currently there?", so presumably their main concern is whether such mechanisms exist in the rules already. It's fine to suggest a way to handle it if the rules don't already sufficiently handle it, but make sure your suggestion follows Good Subjective: any suggested homebrew/houserule solutions should be backed up by citations and/or experience. \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Nov 15, 2018 at 23:30
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ In other words: have you tried this in your own game? How has it worked for you? (That is, why should the OP follow your suggestion?) \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Nov 15, 2018 at 23:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ I have posted on a Reddit-sub with massive positive feedback on the notion of an 'abusive child' relationship (for raising a black dragon). This does not make it 'fact' nor does it mean it fits the OP's needs. Should i delete my suggestion? it is not 'RAW', per se. I seem to be unclear on what your website needs or wants and may be 'out of bounds' as it were. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 15, 2018 at 23:38

No, you really can't change essential nature. Alignment indicates tendencies, not absolutes. You can train the wyvern to do good, but it's nature will always steer it to thinking selfishly for itself. Any training and listening will not be loyalty based, but based on fear of consequences and tangible rewards for loyalty.

  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ While what you say may be true (at some tables/in some campaigns), I don't think this actually answers OP's question: "is there a thing that will help me set a creature's alignment?" \$\endgroup\$
    – nitsua60
    Feb 9, 2016 at 0:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ Updated answer to be more clear. \$\endgroup\$
    – Escoce
    Feb 9, 2016 at 13:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .