What is the normal penalty a character receives to their perception scores while sleeping?

Characters are implied to have limited ability to use their perception skills while sleeping. The advantage Light Sleeper explains that a character who possesses it receives "only" a -20 to Notice while sleeping, implying that the normal penalty is greater. Meanwhile, the disadvantage Deep Sleeper gives a character a staggering -200. Clearly, the default state is somewhere between these two values.

This default value does not seem to appear in the advantages/disadvantages section around Light Sleeper or Deep Sleeper, nor in the Secondary Abilities section around the Perception skills (despite having a chart of modifiers where it would fit nicely), nor in the States and Accidents section detailing status effects. Where can I find this value?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Been searching the book on and over and couldn't find the reference for this (I know it´s -80 anyway). The only reference are the Spanish official forums edgeent.com/tema/28379-advertir_dormido Not adding it as an answer since it is a link (to a Spanish place) and it is not RAW. \$\endgroup\$ – Random Feb 16 '16 at 17:53
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Random Wouldn't the official forums be considered a credible source? If it doesn't exist in any book due to a mistake, forum sites would be our only alternative and next-best option. \$\endgroup\$ – Southpaw Hare Feb 16 '16 at 23:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ I would have preferred to find it in a bard circle (the meetings the creator of the game had with the fans) or in the proper book, but these forums are a credible source, since it is a really good community and very knowledgeable on Anima rules. \$\endgroup\$ – Random Feb 17 '16 at 20:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Random Then feel free to submit it as an answer. \$\endgroup\$ – Southpaw Hare Feb 18 '16 at 0:43

The best reference I can find is in the Spanish official forum. Not RAW, but possibly the second best thing. The answer seems to be -80.

| improve this answer | |
  • \$\begingroup\$ Is it worth mentioning the more-authoritative places where it isn't? Like "Nothing in the book, the bard circle didn't address it, but the forum...." Sort of an argument that this is the most-authoritative extant source? \$\endgroup\$ – nitsua60 Feb 20 '16 at 14:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ Unfortunately I do not posses the transcritps of the bard circles, so I cannot help there. \$\endgroup\$ – Random Feb 22 '16 at 10:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Random I think nitsua60 is just saying that you should add something like "It doesn't exist in the core book" to your answer to clarify why you're giving a "not RAW" answer. I think it's probably fine, though, as I covered those cases in the question. \$\endgroup\$ – Southpaw Hare Feb 23 '16 at 23:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.