13
\$\begingroup\$

You must run in a straight line and you can't run over difficult terrain or obstacles.

If I wanted to run at a non-45 degree angle, do I use a line from each starting corner to each ending corner in order to determine whether I hit difficult terrain or an obstacle?

How do I measure the actual distance at strange angles?

\$\endgroup\$
13
\$\begingroup\$

I would do the following:

  1. Decide which the primary direction is. For example, if you are moving north-north-west, the primary direction is north.
  2. Draw a straight line between where you are and where you want to go.
  3. Move along this line (pink squares in diagram).
  4. You will quickly see a situation where you move laterally - not the primary direction, but sideways - because of the diagonal.
  5. Whenever you would move like that, determine which of the two lateral squares has more "line" in it. Move through that square and ignore the other square (gray squares in diagram).1
  6. Don't forget that every even diagonal move costs 10ft. The move on the diagram below costs 65ft of movement even though it only covers 11 squares, because the second and fourth diagonal moves cost 10ft.

enter image description here

I wouldn't worry about drawing lines from each corner to each other corner, since the rules don't demand any such strict things. If you're running and you need to make a small arc in order to avoid a pit of snakes, you can do that just fine. What you can't do is suddenly make a 45 degree turn and keep going without losing momentum; that's what the "straight line" rule is meant to model.

1: It's strictly academic which of the two lateral squares you choose; it will still be a straight line. As long as you pass only through squares that have the line inside them, you're fine.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 for only worrying about a single line. Adventurers may need five-foot squares to fight in, but they're not five feet wide. \$\endgroup\$ – GMJoe Mar 17 '16 at 22:56
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ While this is a good, practical and helpful answer, it doesn't seem to satisfy the rules-as-written requirement. "I would do the following.." and "I wouldn't worry about" and "if [..] you need to make a small arc in order to avoid a pit of snakes, you can do that just fine" seem to imply house rules or DM interpretation. \$\endgroup\$ – Wyrmwood Mar 22 '16 at 18:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.