3
\$\begingroup\$

Starting my first D&D 5e game soon. I'm planning on making a dual-wielding Javelin/Spear character who darts around throwing his weapons kinda like Kalista from League of Legends. What Feats or class do I need to make such a character to be effective in combat? To be more specific, I want him to be dealing alot of damage while staying out of melee range.

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

I expect you certainly can, and I have seen people do it in the past. Here is a list of things you should be aware of.

  1. Your weapon is effectively a melee weapon, but since spears/javelins have the thrown weapon property, they can also be thrown. There is no issue throwing your spears as a regular character.
  2. Required feature: Two-Weapon Fighting fighting style. Gives you some nice damage bonuses. This limits you to a class with this feature (e.g. Fighter/Ranger).
  3. Required feat: Dual Wielder (PHB, p. 165). This feat allows you to actually use your spears/javelin for two-weapon fighting. It also gives you an AC bonus, and the ability to draw/stow two weapons at once instead of one (useful I imagine when you are throwing your weapon and need to draw another).
  4. Suggested feat: Mobile (PHB, p. 168). You are going to spend a lot of time moving out of people's range and giving them attacks of opportunity against you. I recommend this because all you have to do is make a melee attack and then retreat. It has some other nice bonuses as well.
  5. Suggested Race: Variant Human (if you're allowed to use it), since it gives you a feat. Recommend getting Dual Wielder or Mobile.

I'll update as more ideas surface for this character. I expect there may also be some discussion as to my choices.

Also, you should take a moment to take a look at this for more ideas: Monk Proficiency with Spears/Javelins

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I believe rangers do have access to the Two weapon Fighting style as well. Though with 2 feats you are probably indeed better off taking a fighter. \$\endgroup\$ – ammut Mar 18 '16 at 19:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ranger would probably work as well I expect, I don't see any major benefit from the fighter to the ranger. Depending on campaign settings though the ranger might be better. \$\endgroup\$ – Sh4d0wsPlyr Mar 18 '16 at 19:48
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Fighter gets more attacks, more feats, better armor, and more useful class features. Unless you specifically need a survivalist or the ability to cast ranger spells, ranger is almost always a bad choice. In fact you can make a better ranger with just the fighter class. \$\endgroup\$ – Lokiare Mar 20 '16 at 17:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Lokiare it sounds more like you can make an inferior fighter with just the ranger class. The fighter is only a "better ranger" if you ignore most of the ranger class abilities. \$\endgroup\$ – starchild Sep 21 '18 at 23:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ You can also get the best ranger spells faster from a Bard who can do the rangers skills better due to expertise. With the added feats you can pretty much pick up anything the ranger can do. \$\endgroup\$ – Lokiare Sep 25 '18 at 21:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.