My Bronze Wyrmling familiar has taken the Wyrm of War Sovereign Archetype from Dragons of Eberron, which states that it "becomes proficient with all types of armor and shields, as well as all simple and martial weapons." Okay, great, but how can it even hold those things? Are Dragon paws naturally able to hold and operate items? Do I need to make some alterations to my weapons and shields to allow my familiar to use them? Can it only use them in its humanoid guise (which it doesn't have yet, but that's besides the point?) Or is there something else that I have, as of yet, overlooked?


2 Answers 2


Draconomicon tells us this about dragons on page 7:

Although a dragon’s front feet are not truly prehensile, a dragon can grasp objects with its front feet, provided they are not too small. This grip is not precise enough for tool use, writing, or wielding a weapon, but a dragon can hold and carry objects. A dragon also is capable of wielding magical devices, such as wands, and can complete somatic components required for the spells it can cast.

So a dragon cannot normally wield a weapon. However, a shield is strapped to the forearm, so the dragon could wield that no problem.

A dragon could use a Mouthpick weapon (from Lords of Madness) to wield a sword in its mouth. You can also use something like graft weapon to bypass the whole "can't hold stuff" bit. The dragon could also trigger a dancing weapon which doesn't need to be held to fight. Also see the magic weapon special ability opposable (Masters of the Wild 28) (+1 bonus; 0 lbs.) and the wondrous item gloves of man (Savage Species 57) (42,000 gp; 0 lbs.).

Serpent Kingdoms and Savage Species also give us the Prehensile Tail feat. Creatures with a tail attack and the Two-Weapon Fighting feat can use it to wield a weapon with their tail.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ In that case, wouldn't the proficiency given by the Wyrm of War Sovereign Archetype mean that dragons with said SA are trained to be able to wield these weapons? \$\endgroup\$
    – Arthaban
    Commented Mar 29, 2016 at 14:32
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @Arthaban No. Proficiency only negates the -4 nonproficiency penalty. An awakened snake with a level of Fighter cannot use a sword. \$\endgroup\$
    – SPavel
    Commented Mar 29, 2016 at 14:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ A bronze wyrmling can't meet the prerequisite for the feat Prehensile Tail as it lacks even a tail slap until it's at least juvenile (therefore Large, the size category at which dragons get a tail slap). (Further, strictly speaking, from the Monster Manual, only the horned and ice devils meet the feat's tail attack prerequisite, other creatures (like crocodiles and whales and cloakers) having tail slaps, which is dumb yet precise.) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 29, 2016 at 17:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ @BlueFootedBooby That may be the case in real life, but 3.5 begs to differ: Bucklers say "This small metal shield is worn strapped to your forearm" and regular shields say "You strap a shield to your forearm and grip it with your hand." Dragons can grip just fine. \$\endgroup\$
    – SPavel
    Commented Mar 30, 2016 at 14:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ A minor point, not all shields are strapped to the arm; in the context of this question its an irrelevant point because you just source one that is. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dale M
    Commented Apr 1, 2016 at 4:18

As a DM I would rule that the dragon requires specialized weapons designed for their physiology. For example their sword would look like an Indian Patta sword. it would satisfy both their physiological description and the archetype's ability.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .