Fortunes and Winds (2002) for Legend of the Five Rings, Second Edition and Dungeons and Dragons, Third Edition presents the new race Shapeshifter, each subrace of which gains a handful of Spirit Points with which to buy Spirit Abilities. However, no Spirit Point cost is provided for the the Spirit Ability Shapeshift: Spirit (Fortunes and Winds 24).

Given the Spirit Ability's power (that is, Shapeshift: Spirit allows any level 17 or higher Shapeshifter to use a polymorph-like effect to change form for 1 hour/level into a specific extraplanar being of the creature's Hit Dice or less and employ that being's supernatural abilities), I expect the cost to be prohibitive. Is there errata for Fortunes and Winds that gives this Spirit Ability a Spirit Point cost, and, if there isn't, what is a reasonable Spirit Point cost for this ability?

(Keep in mind that an argument can be made that the Spirit Ability Shapeshift: Spirit has a Spirit Point cost of 0 as the penalty for failing to end properly the Shapeshift: Spirit effect means, essentially, the Shapeshifter becomes for 1 day an NPC that behaves in fashion appropriate to the assumed form—which is, potentially, crossing-the-streams level of bad. I currently find that a weak argument, but if a convincing case can be made, that's cool.)

Note: Overuse of Initial Capitalization can be Blamed on AEG.


I read the whole thing and feel, that it is an oversight, since every other Shapeshifter ability has an associated Spirit Point cost and the Shapeshift: Spirit is the capstone ability of the Shapeshift tree.

I would price it at 8pts, in lieu with other powerful capping abilities like Reincarnation (8pts). At least it should cost 6pts, to be more expensive then Shapeshift: Object (5pts)

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for your input. I'd feared this question forgotten. You have my sympathy and my respect for trudging through Fortunes and Winds. \$\endgroup\$ Apr 24 '16 at 11:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ L5R is my main RPG, so I am always happy to add my two zeni :D \$\endgroup\$
    – Akumakaji
    Apr 24 '16 at 11:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ In that case, if you've time and inclination, there's also this question that's likely right in your wheelhouse, and this question that might be. An expert opinion is always welcome. \$\endgroup\$ Apr 24 '16 at 11:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ Eight points is what the only L5R2E errata that I can find puts it at, so—barring AEG for no reason putting back on the Web actual for-reals errata—this looks good. \$\endgroup\$ May 25 '16 at 16:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.