22
\$\begingroup\$

The question is different from this one.

Disclaimer: I want to clarify something. My question is not meant to find a way of breaking the class or whatnot. My question is because I am curious of if it is possible.

I see that it is possible for Keen Mind to bypass the Wizard limitation on number of spell prepared per day. The reason would be (PHB 114):

Preparing a new list of wizard spells requires time spent studying your spellbook and memorizing the incantations and gestures you must make to cast the spell: at least 1 minute per spell level for each spell on your list.

Emphasis mine. From the mechanical point of view, the Keen Mind feat allows you to completely memorize something that you have seen. Since you have to study and memorize your spells, that would mean that the Keen Mind feat might be used to memorize all your spells.

Keen Mind:

You have a mind that can track time, direction, and detail with uncanny precision. You gain the following benefits.

  • Increase your Intelligence score by 1, to a maximum of 20.
  • You always know which way is north.
  • You always know the number of hours left before the next sunrise or sunset.
  • You can accurately recall anything you have seen or heard within the past month.

Emphasis mine. Since studying and memorizing is, well, much more focused than just seen and hearing, there is not limitation on that side. Also, from the perspective of that a specific rule overrides a general rule (PHB, page 7), the specific rule of the feat might invalidate the general rule of the wizard.

Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a general rule, the specific rule wins.

That is from the mechanical stand point. But from the RP point the wizard memorize his spells easily from "years" of practice, reading and a high intelligence to boost. Little has to do with magic or a magical mind. Just plain and crude practice.

You prepare the list of wizard spells that are available for you to cast. To do so, choose a number of wizard spells from your spellbook equal to your Intelligence modifier + your wizard level (PHB, 114)

The feat would imply that the wizard has an unusual sharp mind to remember and recall details quickly over a specific time. Once that time is passed, if there is not feedback the memory become foggy and unreliable (the spell just might kaboom in his face).

So, it seems that is possible, but, is it really possible (regardless of how OP that might be)?

\$\endgroup\$
1
30
\$\begingroup\$

Looks like that use of the feat was not part of the designers's intent(Source: Jeremy Crawford twitter):

Question: Does a wizard with the Keen Mind feat have unrestricted prepared spells?

Answer: The Keen Mind feat isn't meant to change how a wizard's spell preparation works.

\$\endgroup\$
0
25
\$\begingroup\$

Let's take your position at face value.

Specifically where and how does Keen Mind override the specific limit on the number of spell's you can prepare? Yes, you can accurately recall every page of your spell book. Arguably, this means you could prepare your spells without having a spell book (although this depends on how you resolve the conflict between two specific rules). It doesn't give you the ability to prepare more than your Int bonus + level. Prepare ≠ remember.

\$\endgroup\$
0
16
+200
\$\begingroup\$

The Keen Mind feat does not allow a Wizard to have prepared all his spells.

The section Preparing and Casting Spells (PHB p.114) of the Wizard class description states:

Preparing a new list of wizard spells requires time spent studying your spellbook and memorizing the incantations and gestures you must make to cast the spell: at least 1 minute per spell level for each spell on your list.

So NO, Keen Mind feat does not allow a Wizard to have prepared all his spells.

It takes study and memorization, not just memorization. You have to actually actively study your book to prepare spells, it is not merely an act of memory. Casting magic is a tricky thing and defies explanation sometimes. That's why it is magic.

\$\endgroup\$
10
\$\begingroup\$

No.

By a strict RAW reading, the most this feat would do is remove the time requirement of memorizing the newly prepared spells, but not the long rest requirement to change the list in the first place. If the feat did modify the long rest requirement, it would say so.

Why? Because even when changing something as menial as a level 1 magic missile, you still need a long rest even without the feat despite a level 1 spell requiring only 1 minute to replace.

My extrapolation:

This is primarily an opinion based answer derived from reading the PHB with respect to Wizard spellcasting, preparation and and requires the use of inductive reasoning.

Preparation of a spell is not simple memorization, if it was Keen Mind would include a statement which indicates that you could prepare all of your spells as a Wizard. Preparation includes memorization, but also includes rituals, somatic and material component costs associated with the spells. I'll cover a house rule I use for this last, but I'll get into preparation first.

A wizard preparing spells for the day takes the time to memorize them. You've already done this with Keen Mind. Consider that somatic components of a spell may be something extremely complicated that is time intensive. Which means spending part of your long rest performing the somatic portion, but leaving the final part off of the spell to be completed later, kind of a hang-fire situation. The spell slot could be the power containing the prepared spell, with the trigger releasing it being the final part of your casting. The long rest in this situation would be required in order to prepare things like this.

Plainly put though, 5e doesn't provide specific incantations and gestures required, so we have to extrapolate. Based on the description of spell casting and how wizards prepare their spells, the requirement of a long rest to change spells seems to be intrinsic to the extreme amount of time and effort required to prepare the spells.

Lastly, as a side note and house rule:

I would allow a player with Keen Mind the ability to swap spells at a short rest. Why? Because a major, time consuming portion of spell casting, the memorization of the incantations, has been effectively removed. However I would personally rule that a short rest would need a minimum of 1 hour for the Wizard to alter spells. Although that's a completely arbitrary ruling I would use.

\$\endgroup\$
0
8
+400
\$\begingroup\$

The rules that were written, and the rules that were intended, are well-established by other answers. The answer is definitely “no.”

But why is it “no”? This answer is an attempt to capture the narrative reasons, the lore behind preparing spells. Note that this necessarily requires delving into pre-5e descriptions, because 5e doesn’t talk about it terribly much. The general assumption here is that D&D is consistent unless something says it isn’t. Unfortunately, one of the things that is explicitly inconsistent in 5e is spell preparation, so this is necessarily going to get a bit subjective.¹

The first thing to understand is that D&D’s magic system is based off the works of Jack Vance, in his Dying Earth series. There, all who used magic were forced to work as D&D wizards do, with a spellbook and with pain-staking memorization. In fact, preparing spells was a great deal harder in those works than they ever have been in D&D. Gary Gygax explicitly noted that D&D’s “Vancian magic system” comes from the series:

Just what portions of these works, the subsequent AD&D game, stemmed from inspiration related to the writing of Jack Vance? Several elements, the unquestioned foremost being the magic system used in these games. To my way of thinking, the concept of a spell itself being magical, that its written form carried energy, seemed a perfect way to balance the mage against other types of characters in the game. The memorization of the spell required time and concentration so as to impart not merely the written content but also its magical energies. When subsequently cast—by speaking or some other means—the words or gestures, or whatever triggered the magical force of the spell, leaving a blank place in the brain where the previously memorized spell had been held. Because I explained this often, attributing its inspiration to Jack Vance, the D&D magic system of memorized then forgotten spells was dubbed by gamers “the Vancian magic system”.

(“Jack Vance & the D&D Game,” Gygax 2001, pg. 2)

Several key notes here:

  • a spell itself [was] magical, […] its written form carried energy

  • The memorization of the spell required time and concentration so as to impart not merely the written content but also its magical energies.

  • When subsequently cast […] leaving a blank place in the brain where the previously memorized spell had been held.

Here we see that spell preparation isn’t merely memorization—it’s also imbuing oneself with the magical energy of the spell itself. The prepared spell is, itself, “a thing”—and a thing that could go away. Casting the spell removed it from your memory—and also meant the energy required for it went away.

Now, there is a key note here: prior to 4e, wizards had to prepare each individual spell in a specific slot. You want to be able to cast fireball three times today? Prepare fireball three times, in three separate slots. You want to cast fireball from a 5th-level slot for more damage?² You have to decide that when you’re preparing your spells, and then you have to decide how many 5th-level spell slots you’re using that way. When you cast a prepared spell, you lost all of it—the energy, the knowledge, everything. You might have another copy, but that was in a separate spell slot. And prior to 3e,³ all spellcasters worked this way—wizards prepared from a spellbook, clerics prepared by praying, etc., but all prepared spells into individual slots.

In 5e, things were changed to make spell preparation a little easier: you no longer have to prepare each spell into a specific slot, and thus decide how many slots are being devoted to each spell. Effectively, they divorced “the power to cast the spell” (spell slot) from “knowledge of the spell” (prepared spell), where they had previously been one and the same. This was almost-certainly done for gamist reasons,⁴ because playing a wizard in earlier editions was notoriously complex—and notoriously time-consuming. From a gameplay perspective, it’s a great change. But it does make it a little harder to connect 5e spellcasting to the Vancian vision.

But this change actually started in 3e—not with the wizard, but the (new at the time) sorcerer. The mechanics of the sorcerer’s spellcasting didn’t change much between 3e and 5e. It was presented as having a certain number of spells “permanently memorized,” but only enough energy—spell slots—to cast a limited number of them each day. A given slot wasn’t dedicated to a particular spell until the moment you decided to cast it—and once you did, you could always do so again so long as you had slots remaining that were high enough in level. Already we have a case where knowledge of a spell wasn’t part-and-parcel with the ability to cast it. D&D 3e referred to casters who didn’t prepare spells as “spontaneous.”

And in 3e,⁵ there was also a spellthief class from the Complete Adventurer supplement. The spellthief did what it says on the tin, it stole spells. For a wizard (or another class that prepared spells), this was very clear: you stole the spell they’d prepared, knowledge and energy both. For sorcerers and others like them, however, it was less clear how this worked narratively. Complete Adventurer has this to say:

The target of a steal spell attack loses one 0-level or 1st-level spell from memory if she prepares spells ahead of time, or one 0-level or 1st-level spell slot if she is a spontaneous caster. A spontaneous caster also loses the ability to cast the stolen spell for 1 minute. […]

For example, a 1st-level spellthief who uses this ability against a 1st-level sorcerer could choose to steal magic missile. Assuming the sorcerer knew that spell, a successful steal spell attack would eliminate one 1st-level spell slot and temporarily prevent her from casting magic missile. If the same spellthief stole magic missile from a wizard who had it prepared, the wizard would lose one prepared magic missile spell (but wouldn’t lose any other magic missile spells she might also have prepared).

(Complete Adventurer, D&D 3.5e, pg. 16)

This demonstrates that in some sense, even when we separate knowledge of the spell from spell slots, “the spell” is still “a thing,” that can be stolen. Both knowledge and magic come together when the spellthief successfully takes one.

So it is still in 5e, now applying to wizards too. A prepared spell has magic of its own, separate from the spell slot that will eventually be dedicated to casting it. That applies equally whether the spell was prepared that morning from a spellbook, or “prepared” years and years ago and written in one’s blood, as with a sorcerer. “Just” knowing the details of the spell—even knowing all the details of the spell—isn’t enough to prepare it; you need the magic too.

And that is why Keen Mind does not affect how many spells a wizard may prepare.

  1. Spell preparation remained pretty consistent through the TSR era. Wizards of the Coast added some new variations in 3e—e.g. the sorcerer, who didn’t prepare spells at all—but the 3e wizard was much the same as the wizards and magic-users before it. 4e changed things—as in everything, not just spell preparation—massively, but 5e undid most of those changes. Nonetheless, 5e spell preparation is still different from 3e and earlier spell preparation in some key ways that do affect this answer.

  2. Prior to 5e, casting a spell from a higher-than-necessary spell slot had no inherent benefit. In 3e, however, metamagic wasn’t a sorcerer-specific thing; instead, each was a feat. Instead of costing sorcery points, metamagic feats required you to cast the spell from a higher spell level—and some of them could, indeed, cause the spell to deal more damage in exchange. For instance, a maximized fireball counted as a 6th-level spell, and instead of doing Xd6 fire damage, it would simply deal 6×X fire damage, as if you’d rolled a 6 on every die.

  3. Read: all those that Gygax worked on, since 3e was published by Wizards of the Coast well after Gygax was out of the game.

  4. I’m sure someone from the D&D development team discussed this change somewhere, but I haven’t had any luck finding any such comments.

  5. Actually “the v.3.5 revised edition.”

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .