12
\$\begingroup\$

I am wondering about the wording here. On PHB p. 75, the description of the Eldritch Knight fighter's War Magic feature says:

When you use your action to cast a cantrip, you can make one weapon attack as a bonus action.

Does the Eldritch Knight's War Magic feature benefit from the Extra Attack feature, allowing them to make multiple attacks?

I feel like the wording would have to be "you can take an Attack action as a bonus action" to have access to multiple attacks. But the current wording doesn't so I read this as not allowing multiple attacks.

Am I right, or does War Magic allow the Eldritch Knight to benefit from the "Extra Attack" feature too?

\$\endgroup\$
34
\$\begingroup\$

No, War Magic doesn't allow multiple bonus-action attacks.

War Magic gives you one weapon attack as a bonus action.

Extra Attack can be used when you use the Attack action.

The two are completely and deliberately different; "an attack" is not the same as "the Attack action".

\$\endgroup\$
-5
\$\begingroup\$

I believe it DOES apply extra attacks under the following understanding:

"...when you take your (regular) action to cast a cantrip, you may make one weapon attack as a bonus action." You're allowed to make an attack action as a bonus action, it just must be made with a weapon. So in this case, you cannot make an unarmed attack with this bonus action. Although you can make the attack with a bow if you so chose, since it doesn't specify past "weapon attack".

"...you can attack twice, instead of once, whenever you take the Attack action on your turn." Multi Attack says "instead of". So rather than being limited to a single attack (as the attack action is described in PHB), it would allow as many attacks as your fighter level allows. A standard attack action is defined as "...whether you are swinging a sword, firing an arrow from your bow or brawling with your fists" (according to PHB). Two of these are explicitly making weapon attacks and War Magic specifies "weapon attack". Swords and Bows are both weapons.

I also want to cite several spells that do not count as regular actions yet would undoubtedly count as "casting a spell":

  • Shield (1 reaction)
  • Magic Weapon (1 bonus action)
  • Counter Spell (1 reaction)

Even though these are clearly spells not using the regular action, they are spells and all are subject to consuming spell slots when cast. On this same logic, War Magic is an attack action taken with the bonus action and simply requires that said attack action is made with a weapon.

I know that most of the answers on this topic so far say that this isn't taking an attack action, but my logic comes from the fact that some spells specify when they take an action other than the usual normal action yet still count as "cast a spell". Despite the attack requiring a weapon, it should still count as "taking the attack action" even though it's using the bonus action and has a prerequisite to using a cantrip beforehand as the regular action.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ I've removed links to sites hosting copyright-infringing content from the answer. In addition, the answer is wrong; "an attack" is not the same thing as "the Attack action". See this Q&A: What does upper-case-A-Attack action vs. lower-case-a-attack mean? War Magic grants a single attack as a bonus action - it doesn't grant an additional "Attack action". (Also, as a sidenote: the class feature is called Extra Attack, not Multi Attack.) And finally, all spells specify their casting time - but I'm not sure how that's meant to support the answer. \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Sep 26 '20 at 22:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ From a gameplay standpoint, this means War Magic needs to replace Extra Attack and the spells are no longer supplementing the Eldritch Knight as they are instead costing him/her of other features. The fact that these aren't compatible, particularly with the restrictions on the spells an Eldritch Knight can learn, just totals out to "They need this as compensation to function" rather than "this helps them function better than a plain fighter or on par with other subs". A sub class shouldn't ever need compensation to simply function. \$\endgroup\$
    – Nightraven
    Sep 26 '20 at 23:14
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Even if you think the Eldritch Knight is weaker than other subclasses, it doesn't change the answer to the rules question of whether the bonus-action attack from War Magic is considered an Attack action (it isn't). And anyway, the Eldritch Knight not being able to make more than one weapon attack on the same turn that they also cast a cantrip (or, at higher levels, a leveled spell) doesn't really make them weaker than other subclasses - the "blade cantrips" from SCAG (booming blade and green-flame blade) mean they can make 2 weapon attacks a turn and get some extra damage on one of them. \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Sep 27 '20 at 4:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.