Can you craft the cracked version of an Ioun Stone voluntarily, or are those just a mishap?
-
\$\begingroup\$ Maybe you need a bigger hammer? \$\endgroup\$– DvdZeeCommented Dec 12, 2016 at 14:12
-
\$\begingroup\$ Maybe so... My question was more about the possibility of having one created like this from the start, since I do not want the full stone power. \$\endgroup\$– Matteo TassinariCommented Dec 12, 2016 at 14:17
-
\$\begingroup\$ @MatteoTassinari: For curiousity sake, why do you not want a full stone power? \$\endgroup\$– DrakaSANCommented Dec 12, 2016 at 17:11
-
\$\begingroup\$ Because I just want the extra cantrip. Specifically, "Touch of fatigue" for my Magus. \$\endgroup\$– Matteo TassinariCommented Dec 12, 2016 at 17:24
-
\$\begingroup\$ @DrakaSAN My players have asked me this, too. I'm assuming that the underlying question here is whether you can craft a cracked Ioun Stone at the discounted cost, not whether you can pay full cost to craft an Ioun Stone at full price and then crack it. \$\endgroup\$– HardlyKnowEmCommented Dec 12, 2016 at 19:59
1 Answer
from the same page you linked:
Cracked: These stones bear an obvious crack, whether as a result of the crafting process, because the raw stone was already cracked, or because the stone has been damaged (for example, if it gains the broken quality). A cracked stone’s power is usually the same as an undamaged stone, but weaker.
Emphasis mine. So, simply using a stone that already has a crack in it as the crafting material would automatically make the end result a cracked Ioun Stone. If this is about lowering the cost of the crafting process, I am pretty sure the DM would allow you to simply buy a pre-cracked stone at a lower price - since this makes up a good portion of the crafting cost, you'd already save some money.
I am guessing that "whether as a result of the crafting process..." refers to getting a subpar result on the crafting check. IIRC, if you manage to make a check's DC with your crafting skill and roll, you can always choose to have the result of your check be lower than what you rolled, since that purposefully makes the item you create work worse than it should by your roll. I think you are also allowed to just forego the roll entirely and just take the result your skill bonus gives you in case of crafting - if you can make the DC regardless, because your skill bonus is high enough, some DMs actually allow this to speed up the game. And if your skill bonus just barely misses the DC, the DM might tell you that you actually cracked the stone while crafting, but still managed to craft it.
In any case, these suggestions are not exactly RAW. The exact process for crafting your Ioun Stone is up to your DM - the RAW are purposefully vague on this, because they want to promote creativity, since crafting powerful items may even become an entire sub- or sidequest, sending you on a hunt for rare materials - but I think you should be able to purposefully craft a cracked Ioun Stone. It would require asking the DM in any case, maybe he even allows you to lower the DC of the craft check to make a cracked stone, but there are no exact rules on that in the RAW, mind you.
-
\$\begingroup\$ @Fering Comments aren't for asking new questions. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 12, 2016 at 15:25
-
\$\begingroup\$ Um, the OP question wasnt mine, just a thought I had \$\endgroup\$– FeringCommented Dec 12, 2016 at 15:51
-
\$\begingroup\$ @Fering My mistake for mixing you up as the author, whoops. But yes -- it is discouraged to use comments for follow-up questions that are clearly outside the scope of the original question. The correct thing to do is ask a new follow-up question optionally referencing this question and/or answer; the author of this question has done that. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 12, 2016 at 17:01
-
2\$\begingroup\$ Do please note that the question is tagged Pathfinder, and that Pathfinder has no special rules for natural 1's (or 20's) on anything other than Saving Throws and Attack Rolls. \$\endgroup\$– DeliothCommented Dec 12, 2016 at 17:14
-
\$\begingroup\$ Thanks for reminding me of that. I have edited my answer and added some more information that might help. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 13, 2016 at 8:14