The PHB states:

Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check

But if the grappler has another free hand, can he grapple the same target again, with the other hand?

More importantly, if this is all possible, and the character successfully grapples the target with multiple limbs, does that mean the target will have to use an action, and succeed, for each grapple, to break free?

The idea is that a strong grappler can maximize the probability of keeping a target grappled by using more limbs. And a grappler with many limbs, can increase those odds even more.

  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Are you familiar with the Grappler Feat? \$\endgroup\$ Jan 29, 2018 at 17:14

3 Answers 3


By RAW, probably.

Here's the relevant rule (PHB, p. 290):

If multiple effects impose the same condition on a creature, each instance of the condition has its own duration, but the condition’s effects don't get worse. A creature either has a condition or doesn’t.

For example, if a creature had the paralyzed condition from both a hold person spell and from the effect of a ghoul's attack, saving against the hold person effect wouldn't end the paralyzed condition until the ghoul's effect was also saved against.

So as long as your DM agrees that your two grapples are separate 'effects', there's nothing in the rules that seems to prevent you grappling the same creature twice. The creature would need to break each grapple separately (per the rules on PHB. 195 for "Escaping a grapple").

However ...

Your DM might quite reasonably rule that, absent other rules, a grappling character (rather than a grappling limb of a character) constitutes a single 'effect' for the purpose of imposing the grappled condition. If so, then you can only impose one grapple on a given creature.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The 'However' is the real answer IMO. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 29, 2018 at 17:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JPChapleau I agree. I think the availability of limbs is meant to increase the number of targets a character can grapple--not the number of times the grapple can be applied to any one target. Or more probably, the free hand is meant as a restriction, to prevent characters from taking ludicrous actions: such as grappling while already carrying something bulky with both hands, or following up on a successful grapple with actions that require both hands, like firing a bow or using that hefty great axe. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 14, 2018 at 22:13

On the same turn, no.

PHB pg. 195

When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.

You make the Grapple attack in place of your regular attack, thus you only get the one attempt, regardless of how many hands you have free.

An Extra Attack feature gives you the opportunity to Grapple the creature again, however, should the first attempt fail.

PHB p. 195 again

If you’re able to make multiple attacks with the Attack action, this attack replaces one of them.

A creature is either Grappled by you or it isn't.

PHB p. 290: "A creature either has a condition or doesn’t."

Much like advantage/disadvantage, the condition doesn't stack.

  • \$\begingroup\$ What is the citation or justification for the statement “a creature is either Grappled by you or it isn’t”? \$\endgroup\$
    – Praxiteles
    Jan 27, 2018 at 7:56

Rather than multiple separate grappling attacks, and multiple grapples in effect, I would rule that one creature grappling another has one grapple in effect. Grappling requires a minimum of one free hand, so if the grappler is using both hands, maybe the DM gives him a +2 on his contested check. If the grappler is using more than two hands, maybe he gets advantage. If multiple grapplers are grappling, they "help" the main grappler, for advantage.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .