4
\$\begingroup\$

As a GM I have the problem to bring more visualization into the fights. Usually the players roll the dice and I note the damage. This is something I want to overcome by implementing a locational damage system.

Sometimes when a player deals damage sufficient to kill an enemy with it a 'movie scene' comes into play but this is too seldom for my taste. Fighting is more than this and should be a bit more picturesque (this does not count for all GM's of course). For this I want to have scenes like:

  • The paladin who cuts off the arm of his enemy or the Elven Archer who brings the arrow into the eye of a fiend.

How do you play this? What if the arm held a shield and what if the fiend cannot see anymore?

The pathfinder system is our chosen one it's quite mathematically stringent and I would like to know if and how it is possible to implement such a system.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ It's not clear: are you asking how to describe fights in a more interesting way, or are you asking how to implement a called-shots & locational damage system? \$\endgroup\$ – SevenSidedDie Apr 24 '17 at 23:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ edited. I hope I could make it more clear. \$\endgroup\$ – ruedi Apr 25 '17 at 5:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks, that's clearer. I'm not sure if this will stay unheld now, but let's see what people think. \$\endgroup\$ – SevenSidedDie Apr 25 '17 at 15:08
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ruedi It seems that English is not your first language. I've made a lot of spelling and grammar corrections to help improve things, if you could confirm that I've not changed your intent it's appreciated. \$\endgroup\$ – Pyrotechnical Apr 25 '17 at 15:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ "What if the arm held a shield and what if the fiend cannot see anymore?" - Do you really want to enemy to become blind after this kind of description? \$\endgroup\$ – ShadowKras Apr 25 '17 at 15:28
5
\$\begingroup\$

My answer--prepare as the GM before the session.

If you know who the enemies will be, you can be more descriptive with them, and you can have an arsenal of descriptives ready to go. Losing one eye might not impact the enemy numbers wise much, but it's a way to describe things on a great hit.

I generally have several descriptives written down and ready to go depending on the type of weapon and the type of baddie.

Some of them are in my notes as

damage of between 6-10, sword: "The blade slips between the primitive wood armor biting into flesh as he roars in pain, spittle hitting you. He backs away, his shield now drooping."

2-3 actual damage after DR: "Sparks fly off the stone body of the golem, the vibrations reverberating down your arm, with just a nick in the stone to show for it."

These are non-called shots, in places where I think they are likely to hit. Most of them have no impact on actual numbers in Pathfinder, they are just a way to show the enemy being worn down. I look at how much they are a percentage of their actual hit points to determine how impressively I describe them.

I also throw in a few for the kill shot. Examples:

Arrow, if just a few HP from death anyway: "The arrow grazes his chin. He drops his dagger, he clutches at the wound, and with the motion, another wound [whatever that may be from earlier gameplay] pours forth blood, and he topples to the dust." (This was for a vain NPC who valued his face.)

Impressive, well over the HP needed Arrow: "The arrow seems to sprout from center of his neck. For a moment, his jaw works, as though he has something to say, then he falls forward, arrow pushed through the back of his neck from his own weight."

And so forth--using whatever the party has--daggers, swords. I also like to look at the list of spells a mage might have and looked to that to add flavor. Look at what the spells actually do and come up with descriptions.

Called shots are a different matter, but you can still prepare ahead of time with descriptions, and if you don't use them one session, you can surely use them another, converting them to fit the enemies they face. Do know the rules for called shots. They are covered here. Here's something more in-depth you can use and adapt. As you can see, there's all kinds of drawbacks to called shots--and that's enough for most players not to use them, unless they have a feat for it.

Called shots are divided into three basic difficulty groups: easy, tricky, and challenging. Easy called shots represent large areas of the body, and are made at a –2 penalty. They have relatively minor effects unless a critical hit is scored or massive damage is dealt. Tricky called shots represent either smaller areas, like a hand, or areas a creature protects well, like its head. Tricky shots receive a –5 penalty, and inflict more serious consequences. Challenging called shots represent very small areas like eyes, fingers, or creatures’ necks. They receive a –10 penalty, and successful hits cause significant short-term impairment. Beyond these challenging ratings lie almost impossible called shots that receive a –20 penalty.

The link I dropped also has a chart, a very specific one, on the effects, per limb. You can certainly get descriptive without called shots. Whether or not a called shot is used in a given fight is generally a decision made by the individual players during their turn. You can rule against called shots being used at all as the GM or assign a high difficulty if it's an impossible shot (-20). YOU as the GM don't decide when it's used, but you can over-rule usage when a player decides to call a shot. However, it doesn't mean that you can't have notes with effects based on hit points and weaponry.

The arrow description of the arrow to the neck I used--that wasn't for a called shot, I just used it once certain conditions were met. The player didn't call a shot for the neck, they just happened to roll well on a kill shot with an arrow, and I opted to describe it as that they happened to hit the guy's neck. The players might not be aiming for a specific body part, but when someone gets hit, it's somewhere specific, whether it's the torso or arm, and you can describe that, even if it has no numbers impact. I like to have special descriptions for critical hits as well--so if they roll high for damage and it's a crit, absolutely, I give out some descriptive consequences. You don't need called shots for that.

If someone actually loses their shield arm though, or is totally unable to use it, their defense would be lower. So if the shield added +1 before, I just go ahead and subtract that from their AC. There's other conditions, like bleeding and the like that could result from this, but I don't like to get too number crunchy with it because it slows things down.

I say, look to the rules and make your call. Because it's always down to the GM. Spend a lot of time looking at the conditions, such as blinded, bleeding, and the like, to see if they apply. Yes, there are special feats that people get in order to invoke these conditions, but sometimes someone will invoke those through sheer luck. Get deep into those and know what they mean, but also come armed with 8-10 descriptives of hits. Put a checkmark next to any you use, and recycle/adapt the ones you didn't for later sessions.

|improve this answer|||||
\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

Called body shots are more vivid and more realistic, but in my personal experience, resist the urge to use them. They slow the game play down to a (sometimes literal) crawl.

When a character has 33 wounds on 50 hit points, he is in bad shape. But, since it is a nebulous image, he can still struggle heroically onwards despite the injuries.

When those 33 wounds are specifically listed as his right leg broken in two places, he's not going anywhere. The mental image is too potent to ignore. Until the character's leg is healed, by whatever means, he's bed-ridden. (and he's very fortunate if this happens anywhere near a bed)

We found our imaginations could deal with the general concept of 33 wounds, but started to get pretty squeamish when 33 wounds meant a field amputation of an arm followed by cauterizing the stump with a torch.

It made for some darkly comic moments to have the sharp mental image of a band of heroes lurching away on makeshift crutches, but it made for a slow narrative.

In the system we were using, the major league magic required to restore limbs and so forth was not "portable". So, we had to keep wobbling to a doctor-healer for repairs.

But, each group to its own.

|improve this answer|||||
\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

I don't like using damage locations and I think Pathfinder is not equipped to handle it well because suits of armor do not state which body parts they cover.

But if you want to introduce it a simple system used in some of Fantasy Flight Games' RPGs is to swap the numbers of your attack roll and compare the result to set damage locations. Their system uses a d100 instead of d20 but by changing the numbers associated to locations it should work in PF, as well.

Example: The attack roll is a 23, which is a hit. You switch the numbers, getting 32 and compare that to your hit location table.

Called shots could let you alter the number of your hit by some margin, for example.

|improve this answer|||||
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.