10
\$\begingroup\$

If a warlock uses their Awakened Mind feature and communicates with someone, does the target inherently understand the source of the communication? Is there some sort of give-away (ex: all your mind-utterances are in your voice)?

What's to stop me from psychically convincing random villagers (or kings) that a god is talking to them?

\$\endgroup\$
11
\$\begingroup\$

Origin Not Immediately Known

The text you've already quoted makes it clear that there isn't an instant understanding of the origin of the voice in their head.

Your Voice

Jeremy Crawford ruled about Awaken Mind, he answers:

You sound like yourself when speaking via telepathy, although as DM, I allow attempts at telepathic deception. #DnD

https://twitter.com/JeremyECrawford/status/711981264740331521

That said, I remember a tweet where he said that this works with the Actor Feat -- still looking for it.

Besides that, the DM decides how convinced the NPC is in the message in their head -- probably based on a Persuasion or Deception Skill Check.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
5
\$\begingroup\$

Source is not known, unless they know your voice

There is likely no awareness of the source of Awakened Mind telepathic communication.

Unfortunately, there really is no specific Rule to support this, but if you look at some of the wording of the ability, it gives you clues:

PHB, pp110

You don't need to share a language with the creature for it to understand your telepathic utterances, but the creature must be able to understand at least one language.

With vocal communication, you know the source because you can hear them, possibly know their voice, and can see who is speaking. With Awakened Mind, it is clearly not based on your own language (you don't need to share one) and therefore doesn't have a 'signature' (whether sound, visual, etc.) to associate it with a specific person.

It is possible that if you've communicated with someone(thing) before they may not recognize your voice. In fact, Jeremy Crawford did rule in favor of that as shown in J.A. Streich's answer to this question. If the target hasn't heard you speak, it's pretty clear they wouldn't know the source. If they have and do know you, then your option is to try to Deceive them via an ability contest. However, your DM may rule they don't remember your voice if it wasn't 'memorable.'

Voice of God - not Conversation with God

In addition, this is only for ONE-WAY COMMUNICATION. This was confirmed in the published Sage Advice 1.14

The feature is intended to provide one-way communication. The warlock can use the feature to speak telepathically to a creature, but the feature doesn’t give that creature the ability to telepathically reply. In contrast, the telepathy ability that some monsters have (MM, 9) does make two-way communication possible.

This limits the voice of god options a bit - they can't talk back. But you can still give commands and berate them for not doing it - you just can't have a telepathic conversation about it.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ "they can't talk back" While they may not be able to talk back telepathically, they can still talk back. I think creatures tend to respond in their native communication method. So while a target human couldn't normally respond telepathically, they could and likely would respond vocally. An edge case might be high intelligence creatures: They may be aware of their instincts and capable of overriding it and so might instead try to respond by speaking in their mind. With the proper situational arrangement, it would be possible to fake a Voice of God via one way telepathy and still converse. \$\endgroup\$ – Ouroborus May 5 '17 at 21:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.