7
\$\begingroup\$

I apologize in advance for the length of this post, but things are complicated!

We just finished playing a 3 year long, evil PCs, highly detail oriented, deeply immersive roleplay style game. As the Storyteller (Chronicles of Darkness), I allowed mostly character driven plot, with occasional information drops to keep the "main plot" going. The players had a lot of control, and really enjoyed planning and minutiae. We covered about 6 months of in-game action in those three years.

We've moved on to a brand new game - good (ish) pcs, who work together (yay!), who are basically at level 1 again. We decided to experiment with a new style of play - basically 3-6 session story arcs, to give the game a more episodic feel. We wanted to build towards a group of world renown 'troubleshooters' who get contacted to deal with all sorts of problems - missing persons, contentious inheritances, murder mysteries, etc.

I started the first story arc, intending for it to be about 4 sessions long. We're on session 16, with no end in sight. I AND my players are used to long, open ended gaming. They all swear they're fine with the pacing, but I - as the ST - am not, completely.

The basic plot is this: the employer of their intrepid group came to them saying they thought a close friend was soon to be poisoned by someone. He wants the group to ensure this friend's safety/prevent his murder and locate the culprit, if any.

They were rocking along great, but I was really wanting them to hurry things along, so I threw in a REALLY POWERFUL ENTITY that is a danger to the party, but obviously (I thought) too strong to confront directly. I wanted it to scare them into wrapping up their business as fast as possible. Instead, they've fixated on it completely, and it's become this massive red herring that they can't let go.

Part of this is my fault. We just got done with a game with 'really powerful entities' that they could face and conquer, so I guess I should have expected them to tackle it.. but I didn't, and now I don't know exactly how to get the game back on track..

I toyed with the idea of doing a time skip forward to the next relevant point in the main plot, but they're so embroiled in the small details of this red herring, that I feel like no one would be happy with that. Should I come up with a reason for this entity to disappear, or for its danger to be nullified? I don't want them to feel like they can defeat it, or else I'll be stuck with a three year campaign of "oh the world is in danger, again.. ho hum." I definitely want them to feel like small fry dealing with small fry problems, for a little while. I also want them to get used to the idea that not every 'hint' dropped is relevant to the solution - especially since we want a murder mystery style.

Any advice or idea is welcome!

Edit for more info:

So.... The PCs are headliners for a Victorian Era circus, currently preforming for a couple of weeks in Istanbul, leading up to the Ottoman Emperor's 30 birthday gala. The circus owner (who is also their go-between contact for the jobs that need 'troubleshooting') is personal friends with the Emperor. During a feast some weeks prior to the story, he witnessed a 'death by heart attack' of an old advisor, but swears that something's up and it was really poison. He turns the PCs loose on the palace, under the guise of the performance, in order to get to the bottom of it all.

After interacting with the setting for a bit, they find out that the heir to the throne has grown 'suddenly sick' in the intervening weeks, lending credence to the owner's suspicions. Through investigation, the PCs successfully ferreted out that the boy has tuberculosis (wasn't poisoned). They were present, however, when a suspiciously similar second death happened. The palace doc said it was a heart attack too, marking him as either incompetent or complicit. They did more snooping, figured out that it WAS, what the poison was, who had bought large amounts of it recently, but then they bogged down on knowing how to make a plan to figure out who was doing the poisoning

This is where I goofed badly, and introduced the huge entity, in a vague fashion. We'll call it a spirit, for lack of a better term - and the idea was that it is consuming supernaturals and spreading its influence throughout the city. They fixated on it as opposed to continuing to solve the poison angle, so:

I came up with a shadowy underworld character with suspicious ties to the palace, named Iskendur. He's sorta of a morally grey Robin Hood character. I used him as an info dump to try and point to the real murderer, but they did the thing that PCs so often do where they're suddenly spinning their wheels and doubting everything they've heard so far, and the conclusions they came to.

I had Iskendur give them answers which were pretty freaking blatant about where to look next, in exchange for finding out more about the spirit's nature/motivations.

So now I'm stuck in this wierd limbo where they've got this thing breathing down their necks, starting to make off with circus members (cause I thought "make it more stressful, it wasn't stressful enough the first time around. dumb) and an arrow pointing towards where to look next for the poisoner's identity.. only they're after defeating the big spirit thing..

So much so that the doctor PC who has featured heavily in the last few sessions suddenly feels disconnected from the story, which really bothers me.

So.. I'm thinking.. maybe give the spirit an "easy" to find weakness, or a way to seal its influence away long enough for the PCs to 'solve the case' and get out of dodge. Maybe Iskendur can come forward with something more like blatant proof if return for the task of finding this weakness?

\$\endgroup\$

closed as too broad by Miniman, Oblivious Sage, user27327, Christopher, Tim Grant May 13 '17 at 19:52

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • \$\begingroup\$ If I had a dollar for every red herring I threw at the players that they leapt on and it took the story in a totally new direction. . . \$\endgroup\$ – Paul May 13 '17 at 19:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ I know you were asked for more detail, but I'm thinking you could edit out fluff to make this shorter. Description of your previous game is probably not relevant. Conversational text like "Any advice is welcome...this is where I goofed...for lack of a better term...so I'm thinking maybe..." should be minimized/removed. A lot of potential answerers may skip reading a question this long. \$\endgroup\$ – Tim Grant May 14 '17 at 0:42
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Not worth it, really. I really felt like I just had to repeat myself with setting details attached, which shouldnt be relevant anyway. I got into a conversation with someone willing to take more than three min out of their day to help, and feel that between him and Anders below, I have found a workable solution. \$\endgroup\$ – Callista Daring May 14 '17 at 4:54
7
\$\begingroup\$

It sounds like you have already had a discussion with them about this, which is good and healthy:

They all swear they're fine with the pacing, but I - as the ST - am not, completely.

Are you having fun? If yes, but you are self-conscious that this is "stupid", you should just believe your players. However, if you're not having fun, do you have some method of making this enormous entity hibernate or otherwise go away?

Alternatively, you could allow the adventurers to overstep their abilities and get killed by this thing, which re-rolls would somewhat solve, but maybe not be the best solution. A "children of the people who got killed" thing could be fun, but they would still be obsessed with killing the thing.

Perhaps you can pull a "wizard of oz" effect where they got tricked by a weakling, and they get a good laugh out of it. Or Maybe the red herring isn't worth the trouble and you just level with your players.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for the ideas General Anders! I'm generally against the PCs dying at the very start of the campaign. We're so immersive that it takes several sessions to really get a good feel for each character, and my crazy friends wanted to be extra wierd this time and have me write their backgrounds, as an rp challenge. I don't have it in me to go through that intense process again so soon. I will definitely considered being up front about the red herring and its purpose if all else fails. I've done it once before, and it worked out really well. I prefer in-story methods. \$\endgroup\$ – Callista Daring May 13 '17 at 22:49
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Also, yes, I am having a blast.. but as much as the players wanted to try new things, so did I as the ST. I feel stuck in a style rut, and want to stretch my wings so to speak. \$\endgroup\$ – Callista Daring May 13 '17 at 22:50
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Cool, hope it all works out! \$\endgroup\$ – General Anders May 14 '17 at 0:49

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.