New answers tagged

6 votes

Will using a weapon not as intended (improvised) still generate "on-hit" effects?

Check with your DM In addition to general rules for magic items and improvised weapons (which already point out that the DM may want to adjust), there are just a lot of case-by-case differences ...
Nobody the Hobgoblin's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Flurry of Blows has to be done after the action. Why?

Contingent Effects Our friendly Hobgoblin's answer includes lots of valid interactions that might apply to the specific special abilities granted one subclass or another. SeriousBri's comment points ...
Kirt's user avatar
  • 43.1k
1 vote

Must a monk's Flurry of Blows attacks occur after the initial (and extra) attack from the Attack action?

We can compare the official ruling from SAC for a very similar feature. The Shield Master feat allows, among other options, to shove a creature as a Bonus action once the Attack action has been taken: ...
Eddymage's user avatar
  • 24k
4 votes

Flurry of Blows has to be done after the action. Why?

You got the main impact There are some additional implications for allowing the attacks with Flurry to happen first, depending on your monk subclass. For example: As you say a Way of the Open Hand ...
Nobody the Hobgoblin's user avatar
2 votes

Clarification on semantics around melee attacks

Inspired by this question, I made a Venn diagram of many different kinds of attacks in D&D 5e: There are two main axes of differentiation, Melee vs Ranged attacks, and Weapon vs Spell attacks. ...
Blckknght's user avatar
  • 8,252
4 votes

Clarification on semantics around melee attacks

This might not be 100% accurate if you consider all special features and edge cases, but I find it makes it easier to understand the core principles. The game has two kinds of attacks: spell attacks ...
Joakim M. H.'s user avatar
  • 2,411
11 votes
Accepted

Clarification on semantics around melee attacks

The Sage Advice Compendium is covering the use of nomenclature here: What does “melee weapon attack” mean: a melee attack with a weapon or an attack with a melee weapon? It means a melee attack with ...
Nobody the Hobgoblin's user avatar
3 votes

Can a Gnoll Pack Lord target itself for Incite Rampage?

Like players a monster can target themselves. As an example, for spells players can always target themselves unless a spell says otherwise. I think it makes sense that the Gnoll Pack Lord should be ...
Frank LaPlante's user avatar
2 votes

Can a Gnoll Pack Lord target itself for Incite Rampage?

It's ambiguous but unlikely That it is ambiguous is mostly because it is unclear if "a creature within X feet" of it includes the Gnoll Pack Lord. All the rest of the requirements would be ...
Nobody the Hobgoblin's user avatar
2 votes

Striking nothing

You can simply strike at a nearby object, whether that be a convenient rock, the nearest wall, or that little statue of a cat on the table in the corner that is looking at you funny. The rules for ...
LessPop_MoreFizz's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Can a creature chose different targets for each attack on a turn using information about the outcome of previous attacks?

Yes, they can. Choosing a target is part of making an attack, not part of taking your turn or taking the attack action (and in this case it's two separate actions, one action and one bonus action, ...
Shivers's user avatar
  • 4,512
7 votes

Does Assurance bypass the MAP?

Yes You've highlighted the relevant rules; Assurance completely negates the up to -10 Multiple Attack Penalty, along with any other penalties that might be applied to the roll. As a downside, this ...
brandon's user avatar
  • 13.2k
7 votes

Does Assurance bypass the MAP?

Assurance does indeed work like that As you quoted, you don't apply penalties, so no MAP. As András said, it won't be enough to grapple most opponents, so it isn't broken or anything. Also take note ...
Anne Aunyme's user avatar
  • 20.4k
8 votes

Does Assurance bypass the MAP?

Assurance does bypass the MAP You are missing that anyone worth grappling is out of reach for Assurance Assurance on Grapple (or any other skill action) does ignore MAP, but it also ignores your ...
András's user avatar
  • 62.4k
2 votes

Recursive combined probability for triggering a bonus attack?

TL;DR There is a closed-form non-recursive formula for computing expected DPR accounting for the possibility of critical hits with an arbitrary number of attacks. Find it below. Using this is not ...
CompEcon's user avatar
  • 509
5 votes

Recursive combined probability for triggering a bonus attack?

Full Answer Answering these questions: What is the expected number of hits using the strategy outlined in the question: without including the expected number of hits from the BA attack with ...
justhalf's user avatar
  • 188

Top 50 recent answers are included