Timeline for Is early entry into mystic theurge still an option?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2017 at 21:11 | comment | added | Kyle W | I ended up accepting the other answer, because I think it is more accepted. I liked this answer because it is not limited to a campaign. If only I could accept both! Now to convince my GM that this is RAW... | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 15:12 | comment | added | Delioth | @PlutoThePlanet well, if casting from a scroll isn't good enough, casting from a wand is. "Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand [takes time]". Very explicitly, a wand-user is casting the spell. | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 13:20 | comment | added | PlutoThePlanet | @ShadowKras Using a scroll is not casting a spell, it's activating a spell-completion item. Completely different. | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 2:59 | comment | added | KRyan | @ShadowKras That’s a good point—yes it would. But ultimately, that’s... RAW for you? The requirement, after all, only says “able” to do something. No stipulations on the circumstances under which you are able to perform that thing, or even if you ever do it. Which is dumb, but it’s still a valid answer even if it’s not nearly as useful as yours. | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 2:56 | comment | added | ShadowKras | @KRyan wouldn't accepting that also open precedence to using scrolls to cast 2nd level spells and qualify as soon as 4th level regardless of class (UMD)? | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 2:55 | comment | added | KRyan | @ShadowKras No, actually. Because by the time the sunrod is used up as a material component to a spell, the spell slot has already been used. It turns into a 2nd-level spell only after. This is valid, RAW. Unlikely to fly anywhere though. | |
| Jul 5, 2017 at 22:31 | comment | added | ShadowKras | The main requirement for mystic theurge is being able to cast 2nd level spells. This makes you treat the spell as if it was 2nd, but you still cannot cast 2nd level spells. If you treat the spel for all purposes, then it should also cost you a 2nd level slot. | |
| Jul 5, 2017 at 22:06 | comment | added | Carcer | The feat is legal, I'd be amazed if any PFS GM let you use it satisfy spellcasting prereqs though. It's definitely not RAI and if you wanted to be super-RAW about it I'd respond that as it raises the spell level "for all purposes" you'd need to prepare it/cast it using a higher level slot. | |
| Jul 5, 2017 at 21:49 | comment | added | Kyle W | The feat is PFS legal or using it as prereq is PFS legal? (Not that I'm playing PFS, but if you have a link...) | |
| Jul 5, 2017 at 21:29 | history | answered | PlutoThePlanet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |