Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 17, 2017 at 15:42 history edited KRyan CC BY-SA 3.0
more detail/clarity
Jul 17, 2017 at 4:05 comment added KRyan @ThomSmith I wouldn’t word it as a bonus; arguably, you could say that bonus applies “after” Practiced Spellcaster and thereby allow exceeding the HD cap. I would just say that sublime chord level stacks with a chosen arcane spellcasting level for caster level, and then uses that caster level. But other than that quibble, yes, that’s the idea.
Jul 17, 2017 at 3:49 vote accept Thom Smith
Jul 17, 2017 at 3:42 comment added Thom Smith That makes sense. Is that equivalent to the following replacement wording? “Choose an arcane spellcasting class you belong to. You gain a bonus to your caster level for that class equal to your Sublime Chord level. Your caster level for Sublime Chord spells is equal to your caster level in that class.”
Jul 17, 2017 at 3:36 comment added KRyan @ThomSmith No, the reading I recommend is to treat sublime chord as stacking with bard for the sake of caster level (so a bard caster level of 9 on taking your first level of sublime chord), and then sublime chord uses that same bard caster level. You could argue for a reading wherein your sublime chord caster level is 3rd, but that’s an extremely obtuse reading that doesn’t quite square all of the relevant rules unless you squint really hard.
Jul 17, 2017 at 1:07 comment added Thom Smith So under this reading, the result would be that after taking my first Sublime Chord level, I'd have a Sublime Chord caster level of 3? I suppose that locks me into “just rewrite the damn ability to work how the authors probably meant it to and hope my DM agrees”. Or, I suppose, spend my last ten levels as a glorified Mystic Theurge with even worse spellcasting. Sublime Chord giveth and Sublime Chord taketh away!
Jul 17, 2017 at 0:12 history answered KRyan CC BY-SA 3.0