Skip to main content
Mod Moved Comments To Chat
Rollback to Revision 2
Source Link
doppelgreener
  • 36.6k
  • 16
  • 162
  • 255

The SRD has a rule preventing negative damage. Other sources do not specifically mention this case.

The [rules][1]rules in the SRD say:

"With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

SRD PDF (page 96)

However, in the corresponding section in the PHB this sentence is absent. It is also not mentioned in the errata.

Errata, PHB, Version 1.22, 017

However since the SRD is to be seen as a free to use subset of the rules available in the official publications it can be assumed that the rule is meant to be in the official rules but was most likely excluded for formatting purposes.

Other sources of rules are also relatively silent on this matter, the closest Sage Advice states:

There is no damage minimum in the rules, so it is possible to deal 0 damage with an attack, a spell, or another effect.

SA Compendium Version 2.1, 2017

Given the infrequency of negative damage actually occurring, and the SRD having a specific rule about it, it is safe to assume that negative damage just hasn't merited official response. [1]: http://5e.d20srd.org/srd/combat/damageAndHealing.htm#damageRolls"With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

The SRD has a rule preventing negative damage. Other sources do not specifically mention this case.

The [rules][1] in the SRD say:

"With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

SRD PDF (page 96)

However, in the corresponding section in the PHB this sentence is absent. It is also not mentioned in the errata.

Errata, PHB, Version 1.22, 017

However since the SRD is to be seen as a free to use subset of the rules available in the official publications it can be assumed that the rule is meant to be in the official rules but was most likely excluded for formatting purposes.

Other sources of rules are also relatively silent on this matter, the closest Sage Advice states:

There is no damage minimum in the rules, so it is possible to deal 0 damage with an attack, a spell, or another effect.

SA Compendium Version 2.1, 2017

Given the infrequency of negative damage actually occurring, and the SRD having a specific rule about it, it is safe to assume that negative damage just hasn't merited official response. [1]: http://5e.d20srd.org/srd/combat/damageAndHealing.htm#damageRolls

The rules in the SRD say: "With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

Updates to include the references to other rule sources mentioned by Josh Clark and KorvinStarmast as well as to add direct citation and quotes
Source Link

The SRD has a rule preventing negative damage. Other sources do not specifically mention this case.

The rules[rules][1] in the SRD say:

"With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

SRD PDF (page 96)

However, in the corresponding section in the PHB this sentence is absent. It is also not mentioned in the errata.

Errata, PHB, Version 1.22, 017

However since the SRD is to be seen as a free to use subset of the rules available in the official publications it can be assumed that the rule is meant to be in the official rules but was most likely excluded for formatting purposes.

Other sources of rules are also relatively silent on this matter, the closest Sage Advice states:

There is no damage minimum in the rules, so it is possible to deal 0 damage with an attack, a spell, or another effect.

SA Compendium Version 2.1, 2017

Given the infrequency of negative damage actually occurring, and the SRD having a specific rule about it, it is safe to assume that negative damage just hasn't merited official response. "With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."[1]: http://5e.d20srd.org/srd/combat/damageAndHealing.htm#damageRolls

The rules in the SRD say: "With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

The SRD has a rule preventing negative damage. Other sources do not specifically mention this case.

The [rules][1] in the SRD say:

"With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

SRD PDF (page 96)

However, in the corresponding section in the PHB this sentence is absent. It is also not mentioned in the errata.

Errata, PHB, Version 1.22, 017

However since the SRD is to be seen as a free to use subset of the rules available in the official publications it can be assumed that the rule is meant to be in the official rules but was most likely excluded for formatting purposes.

Other sources of rules are also relatively silent on this matter, the closest Sage Advice states:

There is no damage minimum in the rules, so it is possible to deal 0 damage with an attack, a spell, or another effect.

SA Compendium Version 2.1, 2017

Given the infrequency of negative damage actually occurring, and the SRD having a specific rule about it, it is safe to assume that negative damage just hasn't merited official response. [1]: http://5e.d20srd.org/srd/combat/damageAndHealing.htm#damageRolls

added 13 characters in body
Source Link
KorvinStarmast
  • 144.3k
  • 36
  • 477
  • 767

The rules in the SRD say: "With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

The rules say: "With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

The rules in the SRD say: "With a penalty, it is possible to deal 0 damage, but never negative damage."

Source Link
Matt Vincent
  • 13.1k
  • 4
  • 47
  • 69
Loading