Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Feb 8, 2018 at 0:11 comment added Miniman @Dacromir Ah, sorry, I didn't realise Rubiksmoose had deleted their answer. They didn't want it to work like this, and they didn't change the wording.
Feb 8, 2018 at 0:02 history edited Dacromir CC BY-SA 3.0
added 885 characters in body
Feb 7, 2018 at 23:51 comment added Dacromir @Miniman The Sage Advice Compendium contains the following quote: "we would write 'melee-weapon attack' (with a hyphen) if we meant an attack with a melee weapon". WotC provides an example of a time we can gain information on a ruling by explicitly looking at what they didn't write. This means that a discussion of "if they wanted it to work like X, they would write it to work like X" is at least worth having, although I'd agree that it's not sufficient as a proof on its own.
Feb 7, 2018 at 23:38 comment added Dacromir @AguinaldoSilvestre Answering your own question is explicitly encouraged by the Stack Overflow format. It's a way of sharing the work you have, but also opening the question to the community if someone has a better answer.
Feb 7, 2018 at 23:37 comment added Miniman "If WotC didn't want the feat to function in this faction, they would have changed the wording on either the condition or the effect." is objectively untrue.
Feb 7, 2018 at 23:29 comment added MivaScott My only guess is so that the poster can point to it later and say, "See, I was right!" Using other people's upvotes as proof.
Feb 7, 2018 at 22:59 comment added Aguinaldo Silvestre RAW it is true, but it feels dirty somehow. By the way, why did you answer your own question? Even answered at the same time as the question.
Feb 7, 2018 at 22:21 history edited Dacromir CC BY-SA 3.0
added 185 characters in body
Feb 7, 2018 at 22:15 history answered Dacromir CC BY-SA 3.0