Timeline for What counts as channeled energy for this tiefling ability?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2018 at 2:03 | vote | accept | Erudaki | ||
| Mar 15, 2018 at 5:09 | answer | added | YogoZuno | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 15, 2018 at 0:58 | comment | added | YogoZuno | @erudaki You seem to be assuming that Necrografts retard healing due to adding undead parts to a creature...perhaps they actually reduce healing by reducing the structural integrity of the creature, meaning that would quite well explain the reduction in both positive and negative energy healing. Not to mention, there are other magical healing effects that are related to neither positive nor negative energy, such as Infernal or Celestial Healing, or Regenerate. | |
| Mar 7, 2018 at 4:01 | comment | added | Erudaki | Right, but that seems poorly defined to me... Because if I were a dhampir with necrografts... Why would negative energy heal me any less when both undead, and dhampir heal from negative energy... I guess by 100% RAW it wouldnt. Ugh. What a can of worms. | |
| Mar 7, 2018 at 2:56 | comment | added | YogoZuno | Actually, Necrografts would not affect any of this in any way...they simply reduce the amount of magical healing, irregardless of source. Neither Postitive or negative energy, or channeling, would change this behaviour. | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 19:29 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackRPG/status/971105497716789249 | ||
| Mar 6, 2018 at 16:33 | history | edited | Erudaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated question to reflect HeyICanChan's point
|
| Mar 6, 2018 at 16:19 | comment | added | Hey I Can Chan | After it was pointed out in my now-deleted answer, I really do think the word channeled needs to be emphasized somewhere in this question. Seriously, isn't the real rules question here What counts as channeled energy for this special ability? | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 15:32 | history | edited | Erudaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 6, 2018 at 15:08 | history | edited | Erudaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2018 at 14:59 | history | edited | Hey I Can Chan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Cleaning up. Hope that's okay.
|
| Mar 6, 2018 at 13:44 | history | edited | Erudaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Rephrased second question
|
| Mar 6, 2018 at 13:42 | comment | added | doppelgreener | If you're investigating the rules, stick to what would reflect changes to actual rules. "My character straddles life and death" is narrative fluff, for example, and how someone would rule spells affecting that is wholly opinion. "My character has necrografts" might affect things? I'm not sure. Our guideline here is: "I want you to explain how X works to me" is good, "tell me what your completely arbitrary personal opinion on X would be" is not good. (see questions to avoid asking) | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 13:40 | comment | added | Erudaki | @doppelgreener can you please explain how i can include some of what you cut in my question as that would drastically change how some gms would rule those spells (since undead heal from all negative energy unless otherwise stated, and i have undead parts) and i still wanted some of that information. | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 13:38 | comment | added | doppelgreener | I removed it entirely since all of it sounded like narrative fluff which wouldn't impact the rules whatsoever hence being opinion-oriented, but if I was mistaken and you feel there's some aspect of the description you gave that would actually have rules implications -- affecting the actual objective rules, not "what's your opinion on this?" -- state something like "My tiefling is also XYZ. Does that affect the ruling?" (e.g. "my tiefling has necrografts") | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 13:35 | history | edited | doppelgreener | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 422 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2018 at 13:31 | history | asked | Erudaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |