Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 20, 2018 at 23:05 history edited annoying imp CC BY-SA 4.0
grammar, formatting, reasoning
May 10, 2018 at 19:15 history edited annoying imp CC BY-SA 4.0
added 484 characters in body
May 10, 2018 at 14:37 comment added KRyan The best approach, if you are talking about your point of view, is to not ascribe any part of that view to the developers. Its your point of view; maybe it’s theirs too, but we can’t know that, so stick to what you do know: that it is your point of view. Your point of view is a perfectly fine one to bring to an answer—no need to bolster it by trying to claim or imply it has some “official” sanction or endorsement.
May 10, 2018 at 14:35 comment added annoying imp @KRyan Maybe I'm not that good at English. I thought it means something like low possibility of such an intent (from my point of view of course). I'll think how to make it better.
May 10, 2018 at 14:27 comment added KRyan “It is hardly intended to limit what you can do with a single use of an ability,” is an assertion of a fact, not a suggestion of a “possible interpretation.”
May 10, 2018 at 14:26 history edited annoying imp CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3 characters in body
May 10, 2018 at 14:24 comment added annoying imp @KRyan I say it is a possible (not the only one) interpretation and the one rising less issues. Do you realy believe it was intended to save you from like 1k fire damage as you have allready taken 2d6 in a round (it seems most litteral interpretation)? I believe it is a status effect of a sort. You may have it on you or you may not (like being blind twise doesn't matter). I don't see any interpretations more reasonable then this one.
May 10, 2018 at 13:47 comment added KRyan You make a claim about what is “intended” here, and that needs backing up. Not only do you not have evidence it is intended, I personally doubt very much that it is.
Mar 29, 2018 at 20:02 comment added Wannabe Warlock let's take this to chat: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/75275/…
Mar 29, 2018 at 19:37 comment added annoying imp @WannabeWarlock Checked Vitriolic Blast. It is harder to tell if it should stack or not. Should two Acid Arrows cast by the same person stack? For now I tend to say "no". In any case you may ask it as a separate question. Those two abilities work differently.
Mar 29, 2018 at 5:58 comment added annoying imp @WannabeWarlock I'm away from books, so I must check what is vitriolic blast before answering this. As for crit interaction, let's say you have dagger poisoned with dragon bile (instant poison for simplicity). When you crit you have dagger's damage (i.e. eldrich blast's) multiplied, but dragon bile (i.e. brimstone blast's catch fire thingy) just aplies it's effect/status so you still do only 3d6 Str damage. This would be also true for striped toadstool poison to go around the rule which states that additional dice specifically aren't multiplied. Even straight 1 Wis damage wouldn't be multiplie
Mar 29, 2018 at 5:45 comment added Wannabe Warlock Does that mean that vitriolic blast does not actually stack? Also, may I have a little clarification on the status/crit interaction? I was only able to find that weapon-like spells/effects can crit
Mar 29, 2018 at 5:41 history answered annoying imp CC BY-SA 3.0