Timeline for Does a Spell Glyph need to "see" the target to activate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2018 at 21:29 | comment | added | ravery | @GaelL -- see the paragraph I added at the end | |
| Jul 3, 2018 at 21:26 | comment | added | Gael L | Yea, i fluffed up, I meant Greatet Invisibility, not Invisibility. | |
| Jul 3, 2018 at 21:08 | comment | added | ravery | @Rubiksmoose - is that sufficient? | |
| Jul 3, 2018 at 21:07 | history | edited | ravery | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 500 characters in body
|
| Jul 3, 2018 at 20:58 | comment | added | Ryan C. Thompson | I agree with Rubiksmoose. What if the fighter has been rendered invisible by a Greater invisibility spell? | |
| Jul 3, 2018 at 20:54 | comment | added | Rubiksmoose | Ok maybe in the given example it is irrelevant, but I feel like you could also evaluate the case where the creature is actually invisible at the time of triggering which feels like the true intent of the question. | |
| Jul 3, 2018 at 20:47 | history | edited | ravery | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 3, 2018 at 20:41 | history | edited | ravery | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jul 3, 2018 at 20:35 | history | answered | ravery | CC BY-SA 4.0 |