Timeline for Why is allowing players to stack their skill proficiency bonus overpowered?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Oct 4, 2018 at 1:47 | comment | added | V2Blast | @Slagmoth: It's not that monsters never play by the same rules when it comes to bonuses to skill bonuses and the like, but they don't have to play by the same rules. | |
Oct 3, 2018 at 19:03 | comment | added | Slagmoth | @DavidCoffron I equate those to expertise for the monster... as so many are fond of saying monsters don't play by the same rules... I disagree to some degree on that but that is another can of worms. | |
Oct 3, 2018 at 18:40 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 85 characters in body
|
Oct 3, 2018 at 18:39 | comment | added | NotArch | @DavidCoffron I was wondering about that after I typed it. I tried to search, but failed :(. I've edited. | |
Oct 3, 2018 at 18:30 | comment | added | David Coffron | @NautArch a number of monsters do have doubled proficiency bonus | |
Oct 3, 2018 at 18:26 | comment | added | nitsua60 | related question: Are people's competencies in 5e really as flat...? | |
Oct 3, 2018 at 18:18 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 289 characters in body
|
Oct 3, 2018 at 18:17 | comment | added | NotArch | @Slagmoth Depending on how the DM set the DC. But yeah, opposed skill checks become easier against NPCs...i'll add that. | |
Oct 3, 2018 at 18:15 | comment | added | Slagmoth | Bounded accuracy also makes skill challenges more trivial. | |
Oct 3, 2018 at 18:12 | history | answered | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |