Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

###Letting go of your polearm and punching

Letting go of your polearm and punching

###Punching while holding your polearm

Punching while holding your polearm

#Conclusion

Conclusion

###Letting go of your polearm and punching

###Punching while holding your polearm

#Conclusion

Letting go of your polearm and punching

Punching while holding your polearm

Conclusion

updating statement about not being able to let go and punch to be specific to that scenario
Source Link
KRyan
  • 360.7k
  • 59
  • 943
  • 1.5k

If you cannot, then you definitely cannot attacklet go of the polearm to take an attack of opportunity with a spiked gauntlet when both of your hands are on the polearm: it’s a free action to let go of the polearm.

If you cannot, then you definitely cannot attack take an attack of opportunity with a spiked gauntlet when both of your hands are on the polearm: it’s a free action to let go of the polearm.

If you cannot, then you definitely cannot let go of the polearm to take an attack of opportunity: it’s a free action to let go of the polearm.

a conclusion
Source Link
KRyan
  • 360.7k
  • 59
  • 943
  • 1.5k

#Conclusion

I would allow both letting go of the polearm to punch, and punching with the polearm in hand. I would allow both cases to happen without requiring extra investment or enforcing additional penalties. Either maneuver is equivalent to attacking with armor spikes or a (non-punch) unarmed strike anyway, so there is no particular reason why this approach should be worse, to my mind.

I might object to punching with certain weapons in hand. For instance, a punching dagger stabs someone when you punch them: it’s hard to imagine an effective way to punch someone without stabbing them while you have a punch dagger on hand. Maybe an overhand smash, hitting with the bottom of your fist while the blade sticks out to the side, but that might be awkward. “Might be awkward” sounds like a reasonable place to put in a small attack penalty; probably just −1 though, since you can see how it would be done and it doesn’t really take fantastic skills to make it happen.

But punching with a polearm, or punching with a polearm in the other hand, doesn’t really seem awkward at all. Those I would just let happen.

#Conclusion

I would allow both letting go of the polearm to punch, and punching with the polearm in hand. I would allow both cases to happen without requiring extra investment or enforcing additional penalties. Either maneuver is equivalent to attacking with armor spikes or a (non-punch) unarmed strike anyway, so there is no particular reason why this approach should be worse, to my mind.

I might object to punching with certain weapons in hand. For instance, a punching dagger stabs someone when you punch them: it’s hard to imagine an effective way to punch someone without stabbing them while you have a punch dagger on hand. Maybe an overhand smash, hitting with the bottom of your fist while the blade sticks out to the side, but that might be awkward. “Might be awkward” sounds like a reasonable place to put in a small attack penalty; probably just −1 though, since you can see how it would be done and it doesn’t really take fantastic skills to make it happen.

But punching with a polearm, or punching with a polearm in the other hand, doesn’t really seem awkward at all. Those I would just let happen.

going to say you can punch with an item in your hand
Source Link
KRyan
  • 360.7k
  • 59
  • 943
  • 1.5k
Loading
noting the option of punching while holding a polearm
Source Link
KRyan
  • 360.7k
  • 59
  • 943
  • 1.5k
Loading
noting that the balance-based argument has other alternatives
Source Link
KRyan
  • 360.7k
  • 59
  • 943
  • 1.5k
Loading
Source Link
KRyan
  • 360.7k
  • 59
  • 943
  • 1.5k
Loading