Timeline for Does Warlock's Eyes of the Rune Keeper allow them to read Druidic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Feb 13, 2019 at 19:06 | comment | added | Captain Man | To me it just sounds odd. Even ancient languages I don't understand aren't somehow hidden from my sight. I don't not see them, but it's possible I might not realize it's writing (thinking instead it's just a design). Egyptian hieroglyphics come to mind as a good example. Because it's so counter intuitive sounding I'm thinking maybe it was a typo or misconveyed (hence my mention of RAI). That's also why I mentioned it depends on what Druidic looks like, maybe it's meant to be written in some odd way that is just hard to see (like it has super thin letters), or maybe just "because magic" | |
Feb 13, 2019 at 18:59 | comment | added | Rubiksmoose | @CaptainMan it literally says the check is to "spot the message's presence" how do you interpret that any other way than "to notice/see/find" it? | |
Feb 13, 2019 at 18:55 | comment | added | Captain Man | I always took that particular Perception check to be more recognizing that the symbols meant something rather than finding them. I would think (RAI at least) that if you're able to read druidic magically that you can read the writing without that check. (Of course if the writing is hidden then there would need to be a Perception check to see if you spot it at all.) ---- I guess this sort of depends on how Druidic works, if it's meant to always be hidden in plain sight. As in the characters themselves are like that. Then, if that's the case, does being able to read them negate that. | |
Feb 13, 2019 at 16:39 | vote | accept | IrateDwarf | ||
Feb 13, 2019 at 16:28 | history | edited | Rubiksmoose | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
Feb 13, 2019 at 16:08 | history | edited | Rubiksmoose | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
Feb 13, 2019 at 16:03 | history | edited | Rubiksmoose | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
Feb 13, 2019 at 16:02 | history | edited | Rubiksmoose | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
Feb 13, 2019 at 15:57 | history | answered | Rubiksmoose | CC BY-SA 4.0 |