Timeline for Can a grung druid use their Poisonous Skin trait during Wild Shape?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 9, 2019 at 21:16 | comment | added | Carcer | @NautArch to quote myself in comments on the other answer, "An argument might be made that player character grung are obviously not the same as NPC monster grung but at that point I think you're not arguing in good faith." Yes, PCs and NPCs don't always follow the same rules but that's really taking it to an unreasonable extreme. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 21:15 | comment | added | NotArch | @carcer you are possibly right, but PC races don't always match the monsters. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 21:13 | comment | added | Carcer | @NautArch VGtM does describe the Grung in detail as monsters, and makes clear that their poison is a natural secretion. I think it's probably fair to say that One Grung Above should not be read in isolation from the details provided in VGtM. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 19:41 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 459 characters in body
|
| Apr 9, 2019 at 19:39 | comment | added | NotArch | @Carcer Totally fair. For me, it's hard to assign a rules value to something I don't understand because it was homebrew. And this, for all intents and purposes, feels homebrew to me. Because the basis for the poison effect isn't clear, it's unclear how to adjudicate it within the rules. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 19:37 | comment | added | Carcer | @NautArch strong disagree. Just because a given set of rules is homebrewed/unofficial doesn't stop us from trying to read and interpret them in a way consistent with the game's official rules. 5e is already full of cases where the interaction of different rules is not explicitly, precisely described by the game and the DM must make adjudications for their table; this really is no different. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 12:48 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 840 characters in body
|
| Apr 9, 2019 at 12:41 | comment | added | NotArch | @MarkWells I think it does. You can't necessarily give a rules based answer for something that isn't living within the rules based system. This appears, for all intents and purposes, to be unofficial homebrew style material, which makes it difficult to know the specifics of how it works to apply the official rules to it. My point is that because of that, it will be up to the DM rather than up to the rules. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 0:44 | history | edited | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed formatting; added DMsGuild link
|
| Apr 9, 2019 at 0:36 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| Apr 9, 2019 at 0:29 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| Apr 9, 2019 at 0:28 | comment | added | V2Blast | Related question by NautArch spawned by this conversation: How are materials on DMs Guild classified? | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 0:03 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 524 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2019 at 23:37 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2019 at 23:22 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2019 at 22:15 | history | edited | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 67 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2019 at 22:09 | history | answered | NotArch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |