Timeline for Can natural weapons be used for unarmed strikes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2021 at 19:49 | history | edited | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added info about the dhampir's Vampiric Bite
|
| Oct 5, 2020 at 7:18 | history | edited | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected phrasing; added link to my answer to the linked question; added SAC link with relevant quote; expanded answer with explanation; removed excessive quotation
|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 2, 2019 at 2:10 | vote | accept | Isaac Reefman | ||
| Dec 2, 2019 at 2:10 | comment | added | Isaac Reefman | Giving it some time has brought me around. This definitely seems the most logical ruling to me, and to be most in line with JC's existing rulings. | |
| Apr 26, 2019 at 6:13 | comment | added | Isaac Reefman | The fact that every playable race that has access to natural weapons has the phrase 'natural (...) weapon(s), which you can use to make unarmed strikes' could equally imply that they are natural weapons, and natural weapons can be used to make unarmed strikes - especially as there doesn't seem to be any exceptions (at least from the point of view of a playable character). Though if JC says they're not compatible with unarmed strikes by default, perhaps it's just suboptimal phrasing. I mean, with the sheer volume of material in the books it can't all be crystal straight away. | |
| Apr 26, 2019 at 4:07 | history | answered | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |