Timeline for Is the Warlock's Hexblade Curse unaffected by an Antimagic Field?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2019 at 1:55 | comment | added | AgentPaper | @Sdjz If an ability was called "Magic Arrow", and the name was the only mention of it being magical, don't you think that would qualify as being "mentioned as being magical"? I think the same should go for something called a Curse. Provided my answer as an alternative. | |
| Jul 16, 2019 at 14:52 | vote | accept | Rykara | ||
| Jul 16, 2019 at 0:08 | comment | added | Sdjz | @AgentPaper Seems like a bit of a stretch when we have a specific list of things to look out for. I think if all curses would count as magical, such a thing would have to be stated in that list. | |
| Jul 15, 2019 at 23:39 | comment | added | AgentPaper | I think an argument could be made that it being called a "curse" means it is magical. | |
| Jul 15, 2019 at 18:26 | history | edited | Sdjz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 82 characters in body
|
| Jul 15, 2019 at 18:24 | comment | added | Sdjz | @MarkWells In this case the criteria seems to be simply "if it doesn't meet any of these questions, then it's not magical". That's how they use it in that Sage Advice question when saying that a dragon's breath weapon is not magical | |
| Jul 15, 2019 at 18:22 | comment | added | Mark Wells | As usual, I notice the absence of any criteria to determine that anything is not magical. This is probably just bad writing (Sage Advice has even lower standards than the published rules) but if you're in an environment where "Is a warlock curse magical?" is considered a serious question, this kind of precision might matter. | |
| Jul 15, 2019 at 18:14 | history | answered | Sdjz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |