Timeline for Is this homebrew magic item, the Necklace of Peer Pressure, balanced?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jul 11, 2022 at 13:37 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
remove duplicate sentence
|
Jul 11, 2022 at 11:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 11, 2022 at 13:37 | |||||
Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jul 24, 2019 at 2:24 | history | edited | A Random Guy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 69 characters in body
|
Jul 24, 2019 at 0:40 | answer | added | Catar4 | timeline score: 8 | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 21:33 | comment | added | Someone_Evil♦ | Ahh, the new text is much clearer. I still think you should move the duration clause from the top (where it actually makes no sense for a magic item) and you can replace the last paragraph with a simple (Spell save DC 15) on the spell, the rest in that par is already stated in the item or spell description. | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 21:00 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 23, 2019 at 21:26 | |||||
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:58 | comment | added | A Random Guy | @Someone_Evil The number of targets should be 1-7 in total depending on the number of charges expended, and this has been corrected in an earlier edit. | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:54 | history | edited | A Random Guy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 835 characters in body
|
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:54 | comment | added | Someone_Evil♦ | Please only include the factors which makes it different from a standard mass suggestion and describe them as such; I believe the only thing is duration and number of targets. (+ specify DC). Also, is the number of targets 7 + 1 per additional charge spend? This is very confusingly written as of now. | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:51 | history | edited | A Random Guy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 835 characters in body
|
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:45 | history | edited | Someone_Evil♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body; edited tags
|
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:43 | history | edited | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body
|
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:43 | comment | added | NotArch | But having said that, we still need to know how you typically rule on suggestions, including whether or not you allow them in combat (and what do you allow). THis along with what you're asking for judging balance against are necessary (in my opinion) | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:42 | comment | added | NotArch | If you're having it cast the spell, you can simply reference that and not include the spell language (because that's in the spell.) That simplifies the block immensely and lets us focus on the mechanics of regen and upcast. | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:41 | comment | added | A Random Guy | @NautArch I have edited the listing to reflect that it should cast a version of Mass Suggestion | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:40 | history | edited | A Random Guy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 85 characters in body
|
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:39 | comment | added | NotArch | You don't actually say that it's casting suggestion, though. If it's doing that, you should be saying that the necklace is casting it (or have it be some other mechanic - but it needs to be clear that there is casting because castings can be counterspelled.) But again, in order for us to look at balance/power, we need to know strict you are in your rulings on acceptable suggestions. PLease also let us know what we're judging balance against. | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:37 | comment | added | A Random Guy | @NautArch I meant for this to actually cast a spell, though I realize that the wording can be misleading. I am not looking for guidance on what constitutes a "reasonable" action with respect to Suggestion. I was using the Horn of Valhalla (Silver/Brass) as a guideline for maximum frequency of use, but wanted to allow a mechanic where PCs could customize their usage and opt to cast less powerful Suggestion/Mass Suggestion more frequently. This item's effect should top out around a 4th level spell (halfway between the two spells) | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:25 | comment | added | NotArch | Also, how do you currently treat suggestion. This spell is very table/ruling dependent and understanding how much leeway you currently provide will go a long way to letting you know more about this particular item. | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:11 | comment | added | NotArch | Is the only difference here that you provide an upcast option for suggestion? Is there a reason why you aren't actually casting suggestion to have it include all the other rights and responsibilities of spells? And what are checking balance against here? Other Rare items? | |
Jul 23, 2019 at 20:07 | history | asked | A Random Guy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |