Timeline for Would forcing a lawyer to turn on their client with a Glamour Bard's Enthralling Performance feature be seen as an attack?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2019 at 13:24 | vote | accept | Cakl | ||
| Oct 4, 2019 at 4:06 | history | edited | V2Blast |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 3, 2019 at 21:24 | comment | added | Dale M | Of course, legal processes in a world with real magic would have precautions - courthouses in anti-magic zones for example. | |
| Oct 3, 2019 at 18:33 | answer | added | Neil Slater | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 3, 2019 at 17:35 | comment | added | SeriousBri | The issues you face aside from this are that getting anything done in court in an hour is rare, and a lawyer, assuming they are lawful in alignment might speak glowingly of you, but will be unlikely to lie on your behalf, ESPECIALLY in court. | |
| Oct 3, 2019 at 17:26 | comment | added | MikeQ | Related: What counts as an attack? | |
| Oct 3, 2019 at 17:22 | history | asked | Cakl | CC BY-SA 4.0 |