Timeline for Does the Maztican goddess of love, Kiltzi, support homosexuality?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 2, 2020 at 16:35 | comment | added | Maxpire | I inserted a part that talks about ET got home's answer to complement what you guys pointed out was missing in my question and I've put ''my interpretation'' in strong text to show it was how I would handle it, thanks for the info though. | |
| Jan 2, 2020 at 16:33 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 142 characters in body
|
| Jan 2, 2020 at 3:36 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 2, 2020 at 1:50 | comment | added | nick012000 | Given that some of the love goddesses on this list are real-world pagan goddesses from heteronormative cultures, I'm pretty sure that they themselves would have been heteronormative. Freya, for instance, came from the Norse, who had a culture where a man who was accused of being homosexual was obligated to kill the accuser. Not sure about Aphrodite's position on the matter, since the Greeks had a culture that involved men having sex with boys relatively commonly, and I'm not sure what the ancient Egyptians thought of the matter. | |
| Jan 1, 2020 at 20:28 | comment | added | Please stop being evil | So, I'm not sure where you get 'the gender of people in love should not matter' from. As a Maztican thing, I mean. The novel setting is pretty clearly an analogue to the author's poorly-informed stereotype of the Aztec empire, and the Aztec both in actuality and in stereotype opposed homosexuality. The details of any native group besides the Aztecs are a lot harder to come by particularly due to the proliferation of misinformation, but the Aztecs themselves are clearer. | |
| Jan 1, 2020 at 19:19 | history | edited | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 12:50 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 11:55 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 465 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 11:34 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 11:03 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 58 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 10:15 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 10:12 | comment | added | Maxpire | I strongly believe there would be an accurate answer to the question (by using standard english) because the Goddess exist in Canon but not in 5e Canon. But fair point. Noted. | |
| Jan 1, 2020 at 10:05 | comment | added | Purple Monkey | Just because there is no (5e) answer doesn't mean that the 5e tag should be removed from the question. If there is no answer, then that itself is an answer; and other related metas How to answer a RAW question when the RAW are silent?, What is an acceptable form for a “no” answer to a question of the form “Does X exist in the lore?”. | |
| Jan 1, 2020 at 9:54 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 375 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 9:46 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 375 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 9:38 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 9:33 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 82 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 8:23 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 8:06 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 7:46 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 7:35 | history | edited | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 7:25 | history | answered | Maxpire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |