Timeline for What range categories exist for spells?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 1, 2020 at 12:03 | vote | accept | J. Mini | ||
Mar 25, 2020 at 20:21 | answer | added | RevanantBacon | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 25, 2020 at 20:20 | comment | added | J. Mini | @HeyICanChan It sounds like a step in the right direction, particularly if it covers why the original question is so difficult. | |
Mar 25, 2020 at 19:40 | comment | added | Hey I Can Chan | I think an itemized and annotated 50-entry-or-more list strains the site's guidelines. An answer could, however, summarize some categories then provide a link to where specific information's available. Would that be acceptable? | |
Mar 25, 2020 at 18:52 | comment | added | KRyan | I understood what you meant, and maintain my concern. Maybe the result wouldn’t be too much, but I for one could not even begin to imagine trying to collect it. That’s way more effort than I have ever put into a Stack Exchange answer, and I have put an enormous amount of effort into a fair number of answers around here. | |
Mar 25, 2020 at 18:51 | comment | added | J. Mini | @KRyan I'm not asking for a comprehensive list of ranges, I'm asking for categories of ranges. Hopefully that narrows things down. For example, I don't care if there's only one spell in the game with a range of exactly 1337 feet because that would presumably fall in to a category containing many other very long range spells with exact ranges. | |
Mar 25, 2020 at 18:48 | comment | added | KRyan | This is a good question, and should be one we can handle... but I strongly suspect we cannot. Individual spells make up new range and area descriptions all the time, and going through all of them is a monumental task—and may result in an answer too large for Stack Exchange. I wish you luck, though. | |
Mar 25, 2020 at 18:45 | history | asked | J. Mini | CC BY-SA 4.0 |