Timeline for Can you voluntarily suppress the effect of a continuous magic item you are wearing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2020 at 21:44 | comment | added | Hey I Can Chan | @JohnMontgomery I believe your understanding is correct. A magic shovel that, when employed as a digging tool, digs magically big holes is use-activated. A magic ring that, when thrown at a creature, automatically expands to entrap the target is use-activated. A piece of clothing isn't typically use-activated because it's just worn (the wearer doesn't do anything with the clothing even if he does things while wearing the clothing), so those should usually be command word or continuous magic items. Maybe a new question should be posed to clarify further? | |
| May 15, 2020 at 21:11 | comment | added | John Montgomery | My understanding of "use-activated" is that it applies to items that trigger their effect when you use them in some way. I'm not sure how you would apply that to a ring (other than just putting it on and taking it off, which is how a continuous effect on it would already work by default). | |
| May 15, 2020 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackRPG/status/1261355672496558081 | ||
| May 15, 2020 at 14:37 | answer | added | MrTakeru | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 15, 2020 at 14:12 | vote | accept | Verdict00 | ||
| May 15, 2020 at 12:47 | answer | added | Hey I Can Chan | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 15, 2020 at 11:17 | comment | added | MrTakeru | I don't have the book right now, I'll answer later, but were you thinking in toggling the knives on/off or just unlimited casting? | |
| May 15, 2020 at 10:48 | history | asked | Verdict00 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |