Timeline for How much damage should a Rogue lvl5/Monk lvl6 be able to do with unarmed strike in 5e?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2020 at 9:33 | comment | added | Kyuzio Honar | Thank you for the response! The player has played up through 4e, but this is both our first campaign in 5e (I hadn't played since about 1994), so i wasn't sure if it was him or I that was culprit. Thanks again! | |
| Dec 20, 2020 at 9:25 | vote | accept | Kyuzio Honar | ||
| S Dec 20, 2020 at 2:48 | history | suggested | Malady | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Spelling fix.
|
| Dec 20, 2020 at 2:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 20, 2020 at 2:48 | |||||
| Dec 19, 2020 at 22:07 | history | edited | Thomas Markov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2020 at 22:04 | comment | added | Thomas Markov | @TimGrant I’m saying that the magic items are making it seem like the monk is powerful for monk reasons, but the reality is that the magic items are OP and synergize well with the monk. The monk seems OP, but really it’s the magic items being amplified by the monk’s four attacks. | |
| Dec 19, 2020 at 21:59 | comment | added | Tim Grant | What's with “seem” OP? You mathematically show that the magic items are indeed OP. | |
| Dec 19, 2020 at 20:41 | comment | added | Vigil | May be worth also pointing out that "allowing the sneak attack" on unarmed strikes isn't really much of an issue (emphasising that the real issue is the items) - since without that allowance, this character could just use a dagger as a monk weapon (changing none of the numbers) and still have their 2 main attacks qualify for sneak attack. This allowance does allow them to sneak attack on their bonus action unarmed strikes, but they will usually hit at least 1 of their 2 main attacks anyway. | |
| Dec 19, 2020 at 16:41 | history | edited | Thomas Markov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 881 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2020 at 16:28 | history | undeleted | Thomas Markov | ||
| Dec 19, 2020 at 16:28 | history | deleted | Thomas Markov | via Vote | |
| Dec 19, 2020 at 16:19 | history | answered | Thomas Markov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |