Timeline for Do the effects of the "beard" attack from a bearded devil interfere with recovering from the infernal wound from its "glaive" attack?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021 at 13:07 | comment | added | RHS | Let us continue this discussion in chat. | |
| Sep 1, 2021 at 13:07 | history | edited | RHS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
phrased it a bit more defensively for Akixkisu
|
| Sep 1, 2021 at 13:06 | comment | added | RHS | @Akixkisu I did not make an argument in that paragraph. I presented the closest evidence I could find available and left it up to the reader to come to a conclusion. I don't think me presenting a tweet that was relevant to a topic I find ambiguous, makes it my duty to request another tweet from JC about a topic i find unambiguous. | |
| Sep 1, 2021 at 12:00 | comment | added | Akixkisu | You use these "clues" to support your argument, and I say that if you want to argue from that standpoint, you'd be much better off just asking the person instead of constructing these clues. | |
| Sep 1, 2021 at 11:54 | comment | added | Akixkisu | Yes, my criticism is about your inference by extrapolation from a tweet down the chain. If you think that JC comment there is relevant to determine RAI, it would be better to consider what JC has to say about healing regarding those two spells that you declare as not meeting the criteria of what constitutes magical healing. The rest is just two different approaches to reading the material. | |
| Sep 1, 2021 at 11:30 | comment | added | Akixkisu | The argument proper stands for itself and correctly displays the ambiguity. You make the case that we are talking about a game term, and I make the case that we are using natural language. The appeal to JC does not, so if you care what JC has to say, there is only one way to find out, and that is to ask him whether these two spells count as magical healing. | |
| Sep 1, 2021 at 9:56 | history | answered | RHS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |