Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 13, 2023 at 18:39 vote accept lennert nonhof
Mar 12, 2023 at 16:49 history edited KRyan CC BY-SA 4.0
addressing edited question
Mar 10, 2023 at 20:06 comment added KorvinStarmast Ok, thanks, but the implementation leaves something to be desired... standard WotC wishy washy ness...
Mar 10, 2023 at 20:04 comment added KRyan @KorvinStarmast It definitely did not arrive in 5e; 3e absolutely has that rule. But neither of these obviously more specific than the other one.
Mar 10, 2023 at 20:02 comment added KorvinStarmast The rules don’t clearly lay out a sense of which of these rules is “primary” here Now I get a better sense of why the "Specific beats general" rule arrived in 5e, but then one gets to discuss which is general and which is specific ....
Mar 10, 2023 at 15:08 comment added KRyan @HeyICanChan I trimmed the sentence because it was a tangent inside a tangent, but I was referring to the cleric’s ability to trade in a domain for the corresponding devotion. Can’t do that if you can’t get the domain in the first place. That said, they “signify a character’s dedication to a particular religious ideal,” so if you are dedicated to evil as a religious ideal, that seems like it’s going to make you evil if you weren’t already. But mostly it was just that I was trying to be brief. Er, -er.
Mar 10, 2023 at 15:01 comment added Hey I Can Chan Minor nitpick on a fine answer: Where's the restriction on domain feats? I can see where it says that the DM must approve that the 2nd fits thematically with the 1st, but otherwise it looks like you can totally be a LG cleric with the Chaos and Evil Devotion feats if you can con the DM into it (The saintly path is twisted and ill-lit or whatever).
Mar 10, 2023 at 14:50 history edited KRyan CC BY-SA 4.0
added 22 characters in body
Mar 10, 2023 at 14:41 history answered KRyan CC BY-SA 4.0