Timeline for Do Vampires have to make an attack roll in order to bite a willing target?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Mar 15 at 16:37	comment	added	Nobody the Hobgoblin		@DanDoel Cure Wounds targets "A creature you touch", not a creature you hit with a melee attack, so there is no need for an attack roll there. Compare this to Inflict Wounds, which says "Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach", and which does need an attack. You are probably thinking of earlier editions, where both effects were the same spell, just reversed.
Mar 15 at 16:34	comment	added	Dan Doel		So, you all require attack rolls to cast Cure Wounds on allies during combat, right?
Mar 15 at 11:10	history	edited	Nobody the Hobgoblin	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 9 characters in body
Mar 15 at 8:26	history	edited	Nobody the Hobgoblin	CC BY-SA 4.0	deleted 5 characters in body
Mar 15 at 6:41	history	edited	Nobody the Hobgoblin	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 78 characters in body
Mar 15 at 6:35	history	edited	Nobody the Hobgoblin	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 1247 characters in body
Mar 14 at 23:32	comment	added	ShadowRanger		It especially makes sense when talking about an armored target; under pressure in combat, trying to get through the leather, chain or gorget at the neck could be pretty darn difficult, even with a cooperating victim. Of course, if the victim is offering up their neck, I'd assume you'd at least grant advantage, and perhaps deny any relevant Dex bonus, since they're not trying to dodge.
Mar 14 at 21:57	history	edited	Nobody the Hobgoblin	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 129 characters in body
Mar 14 at 21:47	history	edited	Nobody the Hobgoblin	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 291 characters in body
Mar 14 at 21:36	history	edited	Nobody the Hobgoblin	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 291 characters in body
Mar 14 at 21:30	history	edited	Jack	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 1 character in body
Mar 14 at 21:25	history	answered	Nobody the Hobgoblin	CC BY-SA 4.0