Timeline for How do vulnerabilities combine, when taking multiple types of damage?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2010 at 14:39 | vote | accept | Iszi | ||
| Sep 8, 2010 at 3:39 | comment | added | Skeolan | Hi Iszi, I added my assumptions and the conclusions I draw from them. HTH. | |
| Sep 8, 2010 at 3:39 | history | edited | Skeolan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1116 characters in body; edited body
|
| Sep 8, 2010 at 3:19 | history | edited | Skeolan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added rationale per comments
|
| Sep 3, 2010 at 16:32 | comment | added | Iszi | Good clarification, but I'm not sure of the ruling. How is Example 2a significantly different from Example 1, enough that the rulings are different? I translate "Vulnerable 5 all" as - in relation to the damage types specified in 2a - meaning "Vulnerable 5 Radiant, and Vulnerable 5 Fire". Is this not the correct interpretation? | |
| Sep 3, 2010 at 13:32 | comment | added | Viktor Haag | Agreed: good clarification, and I agree with your ruling. | |
| Sep 3, 2010 at 5:19 | comment | added | Pat Ludwig | Good clarification! | |
| Sep 2, 2010 at 23:32 | history | answered | Skeolan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |