Timeline for What unintended side effects may arise from making bards count as both arcane and divine spellcasters?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15 at 13:00 | comment | added | KRyan | @PhoenixDuck There’s not really any justification for that ruling in the rules as written; it’s absolutely the correct ruling from a gameplay perspective, but it’s not something the rules themselves actually cover. From actual rules sources, all we have on this are some ambiguous statements from Customer Service and a lot of questions about the precise definitions of terms they never actually defined. | |
| Sep 14 at 14:49 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Sep 14 at 14:19 | vote | accept | Phoenix Duck | ||
| Sep 14 at 14:12 | comment | added | Phoenix Duck | @JoelHarmon I'm pretty sure I've seen a discussion somewhere in the bowels of the GitP forums that was figuring out whether a theurge class could advance one class twice per level if it qualified for both advancements, and the concensus was no, since you would effectively be advancing to the same level twice instead of advancing by two levels. Either way, it wouldn't fly at my table. | |
| Sep 14 at 14:00 | comment | added | J. Mini | "Archivists could theoretically gain access to bard spells." - They already have it via the Divine Bard variant. | |
| Sep 14 at 2:26 | answer | added | KRyan | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 14 at 1:38 | comment | added | Joel Harmon | Dumb question: wouldn't Mystic Theurge allow you to advance arcane spellcasting Bard, then advance divine spellcasting Bard? That should get you level 20 spellcasting at level 12 or so. I will go out on a limb and suggest that shouldn't be allowed. | |
| Sep 13 at 20:31 | history | asked | Phoenix Duck | CC BY-SA 4.0 |